swissaustrian
Yellow Jacket
- Messages
- 2,049
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Delay of Basel III implemt. forces Swiss banks to go phyiscal?
This is going to be a quite technical post, sorry for that.
As previously discussed ( http://www.pmbug.com/forum/f2/gold-considered-tier-1-status-1056/ ) , Basel III would make gold Tier1 capital (low risk), therefore increasing incentives for banks to hold physical gold (the article below gets that wrong). The implementation of Basel III has been delayed for several years, probably due to lobbying by the megabanks. Switzerland has imposed even tighter capital rules on her own, but they don't say anything about gold.
This takes us to the following FT article which states that the Swiss megabanks UBS and CS are trying to make their clients to change UNallocated gold (and silver) accounts into allocated (segregated) accounts. As you probably know, Switzerland is the pm trading hub for continental Europe and even parts of the middle East. Swiss banks have traditionally offered UNallocated paper accounts to clients. These accounts are structured like LBMA accounts or COMEX futures contracts. They have a fractional reserve backing. Noboby knows what fraction of these accounts is physically backed, but in case of the LBMA it's about 1 phys for 100 papers, ie 1%. All this paper is now on the books of the banks. The clients only have a paper claim against them. Due to the delay of Basel III, the pm portion of the UBS and CS balance sheets is considered too risky. Regulators are pushing for smaller and less "risky" balance sheets. That's why Swiss banks are encouraging their clients to take physical delivery into allocated accounts. We're not talking retail here, we're talking large institutions.
The consequences should be obvious: There will be a lot of physical buying.
Let's wait and see how the story evolves over time
Here's the article out of FT, with the obvious spin in the header and with a quite obvious advertising attempt to move the gold to London (it's an FT article afterall):
The last sentence of the article caused me to add a questionmark to the heading of this thread.
This is going to be a quite technical post, sorry for that.
As previously discussed ( http://www.pmbug.com/forum/f2/gold-considered-tier-1-status-1056/ ) , Basel III would make gold Tier1 capital (low risk), therefore increasing incentives for banks to hold physical gold (the article below gets that wrong). The implementation of Basel III has been delayed for several years, probably due to lobbying by the megabanks. Switzerland has imposed even tighter capital rules on her own, but they don't say anything about gold.
This takes us to the following FT article which states that the Swiss megabanks UBS and CS are trying to make their clients to change UNallocated gold (and silver) accounts into allocated (segregated) accounts. As you probably know, Switzerland is the pm trading hub for continental Europe and even parts of the middle East. Swiss banks have traditionally offered UNallocated paper accounts to clients. These accounts are structured like LBMA accounts or COMEX futures contracts. They have a fractional reserve backing. Noboby knows what fraction of these accounts is physically backed, but in case of the LBMA it's about 1 phys for 100 papers, ie 1%. All this paper is now on the books of the banks. The clients only have a paper claim against them. Due to the delay of Basel III, the pm portion of the UBS and CS balance sheets is considered too risky. Regulators are pushing for smaller and less "risky" balance sheets. That's why Swiss banks are encouraging their clients to take physical delivery into allocated accounts. We're not talking retail here, we're talking large institutions.
The consequences should be obvious: There will be a lot of physical buying.
Let's wait and see how the story evolves over time
Here's the article out of FT, with the obvious spin in the header and with a quite obvious advertising attempt to move the gold to London (it's an FT article afterall):
http://www.cnbc.com/id/100417100Swiss Banks Lose Old Taste for Gold
FT
Published: Tuesday, 29 Jan 2013 | 9:33 PM ET
By: Jack Farchy
The wealthy have for centuries stashed their gold in Swiss vaults. But Swiss bankers are now reluctant to accept the world's bullion in the same old way, as they seek to reduce the size of their balance sheets.
UBS and Credit Suisse, which dominate the powerful Zurich-based physical gold market, have raised the fees they charge for holding the precious metal, according to clients and people familiar with the banks.
The move is an attempt to persuade their biggest clients - including other banks, hedge funds and institutional investors - to take direct ownership of their gold in so-called "allocated" accounts, with the bank simply acting as a custodian.
Under more common "unallocated" gold accounts, depositors' bullion appears on the banks' balance sheets, forcing them to increase their capital reserves. Like their global peers, UBS and Credit Suisse are under pressure from regulators to reduce capital-intensive activities ahead of the introduction of new Basel III global banking rules.
People familiar with the banks' thinking said the move to raise fees was part of a broader attempt to reduce the size of their balance sheets. "When it's on balance sheet it does create costs," a person with knowledge of the banks' strategy said. "If there's an additional cost in terms of liquidity, it should be shown transparently."
Fees vary for different clients, and traders said that the increase had not been uniform but that it was generally in the order of about 20 per cent. Vaulting fees are typically about 0.05-0.1 per cent of the value of the gold.
Credit Suisse declined to comment on the fee hikes, but confirmed that it was "adjusting its charges for precious metal accounts for financial institutions". UBS declined comment.
Higher vault fees are the latest sign of strain in Switzerland's banking industry, as investors in search of a haven for their wealth pile money into the country. Last month, UBS and Credit Suisse imposed negative interest rates on short-term cash deposits in an attempt to stem inflows from investors seeking a haven from the eurozone crisis.
The move has caused a stir among traders, given Switzerland's significance as a hub for physical gold trading, and is also opening up opportunities for rivals. Non-Swiss banks are considering building new vaults in the country to take advantage of the move by UBS and Credit Suisse, according to industry executives.
Some gold investors began shifting their holdings from unallocated to allocated accounts - which are generally more expensive - at the beginning of the financial crisis. While holders of allocated gold are protected if a bank goes bankrupt, holders of unallocated gold could lose their investment.
"Banks have been keen for clients to move out of unallocated gold positions into allocated gold positions," said Philip Klapwijk, head of metal analytics at Thomson Reuters GFMS, a precious metals consultancy. "We had a phase where it was driven by perceived credit risks [after the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers]. But this is being driven by banks themselves saying to customers, 'Move this gold to allocated accounts so it's not on our balance sheet'."
UBS has in recent months urged clients to place their gold in "collective pool custody" accounts - vehicles that maintain direct ownership of gold bars on behalf of several clients. By grouping clients' gold deposits, banks can avoid the logistical headaches involved in accounting for individual investors' bars. :doodoo:
The last sentence of the article caused me to add a questionmark to the heading of this thread.