Climate Hoax Exposed To The Bone

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

Unca Walt

Immortal. So far...
GIM2 Refugee
Messages
1,565
Reaction score
2,192
Points
298
"William Happer, professor emeritus in physics at Princeton University, and Richard Lindzen, professor emeritus of atmospheric science at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), argued that the claims used by the EPA to justify the new regulations aren’t based on scientific facts but rather political opinions and speculative models that have consistently proven to be wrong."

A Cliff Notes for those in a hurry:

The RED line is the average of the 32 fukked up models (also shown) they are using. The blue/green/purple lines are ACTUAL MEASUREMENTS, not projections.

1692617148759.png
 
If you look at 2001, you will see the Green (real) number was 0.1 <-- the "model" with the pale green line shows 1.0

"Only ONE ORDER OF MAGNITUDE out from reality."

Sounds legit. Let's use it.
 
Yes, all of their predictions have been grossly off to the high side.

That was part of the plan. Ie: overstate the problem, scare people into accepting their BS, then later on when temps are lower than was predicted, they declare victory and say "See? We were right and our carbon taxes fixed it".
 
I think the Weird Elitist Fascists have gotten wise to how people are tracking things...and are now finding ways to jigger the data.
 
Back
Top Bottom