Lead Stories (fact checker website)

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

pmbug

Your Host
Administrator
Benefactor
Messages
16,442
Reaction score
5,755
Points
268
Location
Texas
United-States
I saw @TRYNEIN 's thread with an outrageous claim and did a quick internets search to see if i could find more details to corroborate it. I found this fact checker website instead. After digesting their report on the subject of the thread in question, I visited their home page. :oops: Crazier stuff than any tabloid publication. Some of it is rather hilarious.

 
I saw @TRYNEIN 's thread with an outrageous claim and did a quick internets search to see if i could find more details to corroborate it. I found this fact checker website instead. After digesting their report on the subject of the thread in question, I visited their home page. :oops: Crazier stuff than any tabloid publication. Some of it is rather hilarious.



I deleted it...(y)
 
Another cautionary tale (thank you @Newmisty ):


I added a "Fake News" prefix for the thread. I will add that prefix to threads when the topic has been demonstrated to misrepresent facts (such as altering video feeds to misrepresent what actually happened).

This really wouldn't be necessary if folk verified info against primary sources before assuming that stories that they want to believe are actually true.
 
isnt fact checker code for propaganda? snopes and the like have little/no credibility
 
isnt fact checker code for propaganda? ...

Maybe. What are the facts in question? It's not hard to see fake news when a story says one thing and primary source video is available that shows the story was based upon an altered/edited version of the video to misrepresent what happened.
 
lead story accuses gateway pundit of playing fast and loose while themselves playing fast and loose

...

What are you asserting that leadstories.com is misrepresenting (or otherwise "playing fast and loose")? I thought they were quite clear in citing their sources and explaining the issue (which I highlighted in bold below):
...
Chapman responded to the state representatives in an October 28, 2022, letter that was also made available to members of the media:
The Department shares your concern that only qualified voters vote in the upcoming election. As you should be aware, the processes used to ensure that this is the case are carefully prescribed by both federal and state law. Your claims reflect a misunderstanding of the laws guiding processes surrounding voter registration and absentee/mail-in ballot applications. Further, your claim that counties have mailed "over 240,000 unverified ballots" is incorrect and reflects a misunderstanding of the law and data.

Ballot applications, not ballots

In an email to Lead Stories earlier the same day, the Pennsylvania Department of State (DoS) had already said the claim by lawmakers was inaccurate. (The DoS Office of Communications and Press, not Lead Stories, bolded words for emphasis.)
There are not 240,000+ 'unverified ballots,' as certain lawmakers are claiming. That is misinformation. Any mail-in or absentee ballot from a voter whose identification cannot be verified by the sixth day after the election is not counted.

It's important to note that this discussion about 'verification' relates to ballot applications; we are not talking about ballots. This misinformation incorrectly conflates an application for a mail ballot and an approved mail ballot.

Statewide, voters' identification for about 7,600 ballot applications has not yet been verified, the Department of State told Lead Stories.

Safeguards

The DoS office says a system is in place to assure that ballots by unverified voters are not cast:
(C)ounty election offices are required to provide a mail-in or absentee ballot to any registered voter who requests one regardless of whether they provide proper ID at the time they request their ballot. It's important to know that the vast majority of voters do provide proper ID at that time. In the event a voter's ID cannot be verified during the application process, voter(s) have the ability to submit proper ID for their ballot until the sixth day after the election.
...
 
Last edited:
I see you deleted your post @cheka . Does this mean that you accept that leadstories was not misrepresenting the issue or "playing fast and loose"?
 
Back
Top Bottom