Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more. You can visit the forum page to see the list of forum nodes (categories/rooms) for topics.
Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!
New details have emerged about New York Community Bancorp's $1 billion rescue, including a lucrative incentive award for the company's incoming CEO and more changes to its board.
Late Monday, the troubled regional lender issued a press release packed with information about the deal to pump approximately $1.05 billion of capital into the company.
The transaction, which closed Monday, is led by Liberty Strategic Capital, the investment firm run by former Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin. Funds managed by Hudson Bay Capital Management and Reverence Capital Partners are among the other investors that are participating. Combined, the new investors are positioned to own about 39.6% of the company "on a fully diluted basis," the release said.
...
"It's not common to see deals like this, especially deals that represent so much ownership of the company and especially with these terms," said Wedbush Securities analyst David Chiaverini.
...
The deal announced last week is significantly dilutive to existing shareholders. For example, an existing shareholder with 72 million shares previously owned 10% of the company, according to Jefferies analyst Casey Haire. Today, that's down to 6%, he said.
"No one likes to be diluted 40%, but the alternative could have been zero and a 100% loss, so it's the lesser of two evils," Haire said.
Analysts are now waiting for New York Community's annual report, which is expected to be filed this week. Its release was delayed so that the company could finish working on a remediation plan to address the deficiencies related to the previously identified "material weaknesses."
...
Since they do the same thing as banks, but on a more limited scale, I don't see them being much more secure. They can still have bank runs, still freeze your accounts, etc. And they still loan out the money you "loaned" to them for safekeeping. Just a smaller, usually more local bank in my view.
Just my to cents here on this. And I'll answer with my own question. Democrat or Republican? The correct answer here is Republican. And not because Republicans are so wonderful, they aren't. But the reason they are the correct choice is because the Democrats are so F#@*^% UP. So yes Credit Unions are the better choice, if only that you'll have a better chance at recovering some of your $$ if the SHTF. Can you imagine trying to deal with the likes of Wells Fargo, B of A, Citibank, or Chase. I'll definitely take my chances with a Credit Union.
I am going with the "be your own bank" option and leaving only enough in the account to pay bills.
I'm there too, but there's some exceptions. I've been my own bank for about 6 years now. BUT,.... I've got a fair sized amount of my money tied up in short term CD's that are paying decent returns. Both of them only have a couple of months left before them become liquid again. We'll see how things shake out over the next 2-3 months.
I believe that recent court rulings assert that bank depositors, of any nature, are merely unsecured creditors.Worse case scenario is you can still cash out those CDs and just forfeit the interest earned, right? Been awhile since I had some ladder CDs set up.
And for longer than anyone reading these words have been alive."This should be no surprise, the game is rigged from top to bottom ...period!"
I believe that recent court rulings assert that bank depositors, of any nature, are merely unsecured creditors.
Back of the line, behind secured creditors.
Worse case scenario is you can still cash out those CDs ...
I believe that recent court rulings assert that bank depositors, of any nature, are merely unsecured creditors. ...
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg returns to the Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE) on Wednesday, April 10, 2024, to present a comprehensive update of how the FDIC has prepared for the orderly resolution of a GSIB under Title II of the Dodd-Frank Act. Chairman Gruenberg will detail the agency’s latest work to resolve the failure of a GSIB in a manner that protects insured depositors, preserves value, promotes financial stability, and prevents taxpayer bailouts.
...
The event will also feature a roundtable discussion of the new FDIC paper to be released entitled, “Overview of Resolution Under Title II of the Dodd-Frank Act.” Art Murton (FDIC), Ryan Tetrick (FDIC), Susan Baker (FDIC), and Nicolas Véron (PIIE) will participate in the roundtable moderated by PIIE Senior Fellow Anna Gelpern.
...
The Deposit Insurance Fund balance was $121.8 billion at the end of 2023, up $4.8 billion since June 30 of that year, ...
You should be fine Searcher.
April 10, 2024 - 17:18
The head of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. says the US would be prepared to handle any collapse of a major Wall Street bank.
FDIC Chairman Martin Gruenberg on Wednesday laid out a blueprint for how regulators would deal with such a failure and seek to minimize costs. He discussed preparations for a hypothetical scenario rather than any immediate threat.
...
Also on Wednesday, the FDIC released a report about the so-called Title II authority to wind down a global systemically important bank.
In September, the agency’s inspector general said the FDIC had made some progress in implementing its Orderly Liquidation Authority program. However, the internal watchdog also said the regulator hadn’t been as focused as it should have been in the effort.
The inspector general said at the time that if the FDIC couldn’t resolve a systemically important firm, “the banking sector and the stability of the US and global financial systems could be severely affected.”
The FDIC got additional authorities after the financial crisis to step in and resolve a flailing banking giant. Officials haven’t yet had to use those powers, but on Wednesday Gruenberg spelled out what could happen in such a scenario. He emphasized how regulators could move quickly to resolve an entire bank in a matter of months, rather than the years that traditional bankruptcy could take.
To wind down a Wall Street giant, the FDIC could, among other things, remove the failed firm’s board of directors and senior executives if they are deemed to be “substantially responsible,” Gruenberg said. It could also claw back compensation, he said. US officials have the ability to set up a so-called bridge financial company to replace the failed firm’s parent to tap the US Treasury for a temporary liquidity backstop, Gruenberg added.
This also laughed at us when they thought they were off record and are trying to hide everything possible.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?