"Possession of Unregistered Ammunition"

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

<SLV>

Ground Beetle
GIM2 Refugee
Messages
544
Reaction score
715
Points
273
The District of Columbia (aka "DC") is legally Federal land (not part of any State of the Union) and has quirky differences in the law.

§ 7–2506.01. Persons permitted to possess ammunition.

(a) No person shall possess ammunition in the District of Columbia unless:

(1) He is a licensed dealer pursuant to subchapter IV of this unit;

(2) He is an officer, agent, or employee of the District of Columbia or the United States of America, on duty and acting within the scope of his duties when possessing such ammunition;

(3) He is the holder of a valid registration certificate for a firearm pursuant to subchapter II of this chapter; except, that no such person shall possess one or more restricted pistol bullets;

(4) He holds an ammunition collector’s certificate on September 24, 1976; or

(5) He temporarily possesses ammunition while participating in a firearms training and safety class conducted by a firearms instructor.

 
Hey @<SLV>

Interesting thread. It's in a members only section. The only people who can see it are signed members. If you want it can be moved to a public section for more views. Up to you.
 
AFAIK, SCOTUS has never ruled specifically on the issue of whether ammunition is considered equivalent to arms with respect to the second amendment although it's just common sense that ammunition for firearms that are covered by the second should also be.
 
And a rail tanker of ammonium nitrate goes missing and nobody's the wiser....
 
AFAIK, SCOTUS has never ruled specifically on the issue of whether ammunition is considered equivalent to arms with respect to the second amendment although it's just common sense that ammunition for firearms that are covered by the second should also be.

Arms are nothing more than a baseball bat without ammo. Seems obvious to anyone except a dunce robe wearing dictator.
 
Hey @<SLV>

Interesting thread. It's in a members only section. The only people who can see it are signed members. If you want it can be moved to a public section for more views. Up to you.
Sure. I wasn't sure where it should go.
 
How exactly do you enforce the registration of ammunition? Arns have serial numbers as a unique identifier. Also, I presume reloading would be illegal, but then it would be necessary to seal factory ammo on some way that shows it hasn't been reloaded. (As if any hoodlum in DC is actually going reload.)
 
How exactly do you enforce the registration of ammunition? ...
See post #2 section a3. As I read it, one would need a registration certificate (from DC) that grants permissions for possessing certain types of ammo.

I wonder if anyone has ever challenged the law on Constitutional grounds.
 
NJ:

If you are interested in buying ammunition, the first question you need to ask yourself is: what kind of ammunition? And for what kind of weapon? What you are required to do next to comply with New Jersey state laws will largely be guided by your answers. There are specific requirements in New Jersey regarding the purchase, transportation, possession, and use of ammunition (just as for weapons). People looking to purchase ammunition in the Garden State may be required to obtain a permit, while in some instances, there may be no obligation to provide such a permit.


 
The article in the O/P is from Nov 6, 2023. Here's some older articles.



________________________________________________

 
Jan 2014
Mark Witaschek is first known prosecution for inoperable, unregistered ammunition


March 2014

 
I tried reading the articles in the above link but they would open briefly and then close. I suspect I need some kinda subscription or something.

Here's some of what I could glean from them. The underlined words are my emphasis.

1). The law, as written, makes it a punishable offense to possess empty casings and shells and considers their possession to be as serious as having an illegal firearm.

2). Prosecutors have spent a year and a half trying to nail him for the possession of so-called unregistered ammunition.

3). If convicted, he faces a year in jail and a $1,000 fine for having a single, inoperable shotgun shell in his home.

4). The Metropolitan Police Department raided Mr. Witaschek’s rented Georgetown house twice in the summer of 2012 on the word of his angry ex-wife.

5). In a surprising twist at the end of a long trial, a District of Columbia judge found Mark Witaschek guilty of “attempted possession of unlawful ammunition” for antique replica muzzleloader bullets.

Do any of y'all feel safer knowing that this man has been prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law because he had in his possession an EMPTY shell casing?

Do any of y'all feel it was a good use of the prosecutor's time - spending a year and a half, to pursue this matter?

Do any of y'all want to get into a deeper discussion regarding how democrats insist that red flag laws would never be abused?

Do any of y'all want to explain how in the hell REPLICA bullets are/can be/should be considered as any kind of threat?
 
Last edited:
DC is was and will be dumb and blind to the 2nd amendment. But maybe we'll eventually get another SCOTUS ruling like Heller from it eventually.
 
I tried reading the articles in the above link but they would open briefly and then close. I suspect I need some kinda subscription or something.

I hate when that happens. Let's try a different track.............




Went all the way to the supremes............


 
I find it extremely ironic that we have such an extreme example of government overreach and how they're attempting to squash this man's God given right(s).
This is a perfect example of why the second amendment exists in the first place.
 
Back
Top Bottom