Stablecoin implosion could be a black swan for US Treasuries

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more. You can visit the forum page to see the list of forum nodes (categories/rooms) for topics.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

pmbug

Your Host
Administrator
Benefactor
Messages
15,609
Reaction score
5,280
Points
268
Location
Texas

 
Last edited:
Stablecoins are supposed to maintain assets to peg their value. Stablecoins pegged to the dollar supposedly have large holdings of Treasuries. If they implode, they could be forced to dump their holdings. It's an issue specific to stablecoins.
 
Maybe these will be different...



First there were coins, but they were too unwieldy
So paper bills became claims on the coinage, but they were not convenient enough for the digital age
So crypto stablecoins became claims on the paper bills, but ....
So ...
 

 

 
Stablecoins are supposed to maintain assets to peg their value. Stablecoins pegged to the dollar supposedly have large holdings of Treasuries. If they implode, they could be forced to dump their holdings. It's an issue specific to stablecoins.

The problem lies in the other way around. At least for our entire economy. ALLOWING debt instruments (ie Treasuries) to be used as money (collateral) is a huge problem. This is another reason why raising interest rates (treasury values decline) is such a big problem.

Tether would be fine (at least from $EC interference) because they were created by the banker scum. Just taking out some competition, nothing to see here.
 
Feb 21 (Reuters) - The world of stablecoins is suddenly looking shaky.

Seismic shifts may be afoot in the $137 billion market after New York-based Paxos Trust Company, which mints Binance's stablecoin, said it would cease issuing new BUSD tokens after U.S. regulators labeled the asset an unregistered security.

 
A tale of two stablecoins...


 


Having crypto on ramps means people have instant forex access to dollars (via stablecoins). Even if the stablecoins aren't legal tender for the economy (like Zimbabwe has done with the dollar [and gold] or El Salvador has done with Bitcoin), it's still an opportunity for transferring local currency into dollars sans government controlled exchanges via a very liquid crypto market.
 
Also... The OP was prescient to consider the potential impact of stablecoin implosions, but missed the boat in identifying banks as the dominos that would fall (redeeming treasuries to cover large volumes of unsecured cash deposits that were facing redemptions):

 
From the link:

The Republican chair of the House Financial Services Committee has released a new draft of the leading U.S. legislative proposal for overseeing stablecoins, and it includes some of the positions of Democratic lawmakers.

The bill posted Thursday is still just a draft, meant to be further discussed at a June 13 committee hearing, but it marks another potential move toward a bipartisan negotiation on the legislation that many believe could be the easiest way to take a first step toward U.S. regulation of crypto.

 
I tried skimming through the draft, but it is 42 pages long and I quit after about 10 pages.
 

Update

 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…