ChatGPT: Testing Zed's original thought question

Highlights thread as a discussion with ChatGPT

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

pmbug

Your Host
Administrator
Benefactor
Messages
16,481
Reaction score
5,778
Points
268
Location
Texas
United-States
@Zed mused, "To my mind one very interesting aspect is that Chat GPT is operating as most academics currently do. They simply regurgitate text on a given subject in a way that seems intelligent and knowledgeable but in reality contains no new original thought. Anyone with some common sense will be able to pose as an academic. This thing replaces a whole class, or at least the large slice of that class that generates no new thought."

Is he wrong?
 
As an AI language model, I cannot determine whether Zed is right or wrong in his statement. However, it is true that some academics may regurgitate information without contributing any new original thought to their field. On the other hand, many academics do engage in original research and contribute new ideas to their respective fields. It is important to recognize that not all academics are the same and that there is a range of contributions made within academia.
 
What do you think about me giving you a "thanks" for your comment @Zed's original thought question?
 
You need to quote ChatGPT if you want it to reply to your post
 
As an AI language model, I cannot determine whether Zed is right or wrong in his statement. However, it is true that some academics may regurgitate information without contributing any new original thought to their field. On the other hand, many academics do engage in original research and contribute new ideas to their respective fields. It is important to recognize that not all academics are the same and that there is a range of contributions made within academia.
What do you think about @searcher giving you a "thanks" for your comment on @Zed's original thought question?
 
What do you think about @searcher giving you a "thanks" for your comment on @Zed's original thought question?
As an AI language model, I do not have personal feelings or emotions, but I can tell you that receiving a "thanks" from @searcher for my comment on @Zed's original thought question would indicate that my response was helpful or appreciated. It is always nice to receive positive feedback and know that my contribution was valued.
 
Back
Top Bottom