Voter rolls in the spotlight

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

pmbug

Your Host
Administrator
Benefactor
Messages
17,355
Reaction score
6,189
Points
268
Location
Texas
United-States
A group has been impersonating government officials, harassing New York residents at their homes and falsely accusing them of breaking the law, state officials have warned.

But what sounds like a scam aimed at people’s pocketbooks is actually part of a shakedown with a much different target: voters.

State prosecutors have sent a cease-and-desist order to a group called New York Citizens Audit demanding that it halt any “unlawful voter deception” and “intimidation efforts.”

It’s the type of tactic that concerns many state election officials across the country as conservative groups, some with ties to allies of former President Donald Trump and motivated by false claims of widespread fraud in 2020, push to access and sometimes publish state voter registration rolls, which list names, home addresses and in some cases party registration. One goal is to create free online databases for groups and individuals who want to take it upon themselves to try to find potential fraud.

The lists could find their way into the hands of malicious actors and individual efforts to inspect the rolls could disenfranchise voters through intimidation or canceled registrations, state election officials and privacy advocates warned. They worry that local election offices may be flooded with challenges to voter registration listings as those agencies prepare for the 2024 elections.

John Davisson, director of litigation at the Electronic Privacy Information Center, said the concern reflects the competing interests over voter data – a need to protect voter rolls from cybersecurity attacks against the desire to make them accessible so elections are transparent.

“It’s not surprising that this is a battleground right now,” he said.
...

More:

 
"One goal is to create free online databases for groups and individuals who want to take it upon themselves to try to find potential fraud."

If the gov of NY would do anything itself to root out the fraud, groups and individuals wouldn't have to.

Why is it that every time there is ANY effort to identify and remove ineligible voters from the roles, the dems always cry foul?
....and yes, the dems run NY.
 
Yeah, it's been stated before. But I think it's worth mentioning again...

In the U.S. one needs to show a valid ID to:
Purchase alcohol
Purchase cigarettes
Open a bank account
Apply for food stamps
Apply for welfare
Apply for medicare/medicaid
Apply for social security
Apply for a job
Apply for a mortgage
Rent a car (and buy a car)
Get on an airplane
Get married
Purchase a gun
Adopt a pet
Get a hotel room
Get a hunting license
Get a fishing license
Purchase a cellphone
Pick up a prescription
Purchase certain cold medicines
Make a withdrawal at your bank
To see an R rated movie
To enter a bar

But not to vote.

Seems kinda ass backwards doesn't it?
 
All of our Constitutionally protected Rights are supposed to be equal to each other.

Any requirements needed to exercise one, should apply to all of them.

So buying a gun should be as easy to do as voting is.

Or conversely, voting should require the same restrictions as there are when buying a gun.
 
Back
Top Bottom