Wealth inequality and the Fed's inflationary monetary policy

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

equal right s is a myth.
Because people pay different amounts.

If you had to pay for milk 50x what everyone else was paying, wouldn't you expect to get to be at the front of the line too? It would only be reasonable.

Everyone paying the same makes everyone have the same pull with the gov as you or I do now.
 

More:


I spent a little bit of time skimming over the United for ALICE website and that 29% figure was from data collected in 2021. I don't see where they might have published any data more recent than that:

 

More:

 
Inflation always destroys an economy.

That's part of the cycle. As a society ages and ossifies, the Elites jettison morality or appreciation for their privileged class and ranks. Fiat money, currency debasement and resultant seigniorage (the privileged elites getting first access to the new money) immediately makes the chosen classes prosper.

So it's continued and usually amped up. The bourgeoisie and merchant classes see their savings destroyed, their costs explode, their customer base evaporate. Those who once had income, from their craft or their customer base, now have it cut or find themselves unable to find employment. Poverty abounds; social unrest grows. Depending on the culture, either the masses settle into a huge starving hoard, or they riot and the leadership is exiled or executed.

The end result is the same, though. The economy collapses and the society loses all structure, all social order and control.

We're seeing it now. The cheapest prepared food, probably in all human history, is the McDonald's hamburger. And now people cannot afford it. For 90 years, our society has been rich enough to support cafes, diners, and then fast-food...now, the average person cannot afford it.

It's the Grapes of Wrath writ large and in real-life. Worse...back then, the victims of that economic collapse had family and faith. We have none of that; and HUGE numbers of the population are neurologically damaged by this Satanic medical experiment.
 
Do you understand, and agree with what the guy in the vid stated?
 
Can you show me where I said anything like that?
Your always posting about gov free health care, education and all the wonderous stuff they should be doing for us.
All that on top of $35T in debt isn't DEflationary, after all.

The ones who have inflated our currency and saddled us with debt are the ones you seem to voice support of.

Kackles wants to inflate even more, as she will need to to pay for the so-called "opportunity economy" she wants us to have.

The money sure can't come from taxes.
 
The money sure can't come from taxes.

Now I might be wrong here so correct me if I am.

- Single payer health care = yes, I'm all for it.
- Free education up to and including high school = yes, I'm all for it.

First, we would have to curtail military spending. Check this thread out to see what we spend on that:


It's bookoo bucks.

Second, we stop giving super-duper rich peeps and big businesses all sorts of tax cuts. Again, bookoo bucks.

Third, we end foreign aid unless we get a direct benefit from it. Even more bookoo bucks.

I think we could do it that way.

Now, as to free education.............I never said college should be free.

I may actually be more of a capitalist than you think. I just believe it's the government's job to take care of peeps, not the MIC, foreign countries and rich peeps.
 
This is Kevin Warsh, former Fed Governor, talking at the Brooking Institute back in 2015, but I saw it this morning for the first time:
The Hutchins Center on Fiscal & Monetary Policy recently posed a question that has been generating substantial public attention: Did the Federal Reserve’s quantitative easing contribute to the growing inequality in the U.S.?

 
The problem is we are not in a free market in the USA. It is a hybrid planned economy where the government frequently picks winners and losers. At some point bad businesses should be allowed to fail and create space for new more efficient entities.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…