2025 Lunatic Fringe - Market and Trade Chat

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

^^^^^

‘It doesn’t have to be this way’: Canada, Mexico and China respond to Trump’s tariffs​

  • U.S. President Donald Trump on Saturday signed an order imposing 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada, as well as a 10% duty on China.
  • In response to Trump’s announcement, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced retaliatory tariffs of 25% against $155 billion of U.S. goods.
  • Mexico also vowed retaliation following news of the tariffs, although President Claudia Sheinbaum did not reveal specifics. China, meanwhile, stopped short of an immediate escalation.
U.S. President Donald Trump on Saturday imposed long-threatened tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico and China — and it didn’t take long for the countries to respond.

Trump signed an order slapping 25% tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada, and a 10% duty on Chinese imports, due to start on Tuesday. Energy resources from Canada face a lower, 10% tariff to “minimize any disruptive effects we might have on gasoline and home heating oil prices,” according to a senior administration official.

In the executive order, Trump said that if the countries — the U.S.’s three-largest trading partners — retaliate, it could be met with an “increase or expand in scope” of the duties already imposed.

More:

Screenshot 2025-02-02 at 7.54.32 AM.png
Screenshot 2025-02-02 at 7.54.41 AM.png
 
That's why they are mad about the tariff's. Not much they can do about it right now. But this was Trump's doing, their retaliation doesn't matter much.
 
🧵THREAD: It's hard to overstate how positive this development is for the American people.

Let's talk about how "de minimus entries" have been used to harm the American people and incentivize corruption for decades. (1/19)



(2/19) First, for a bit of background - “de minimus entries” refer to low-value shipments exempt from duties and taxes when imported into the United States.

(3/19) Under Section 321 of the Tariff Act of 1930, shipments valued at < $800 (this number was $200 before 2016) can enter the U.S. without paying import duties or undergoing rigorous customs screening.

(4/19) An international shipment valued at < $800 bypasses standard customs duties, taxes, and formal entry procedures. The rule applies per shipment, per day, per importer, so companies can split large orders into multiple small shipments to take advantage of this exemption.

(5/19) Because these shipments don’t undergo rigorous inspection, it's easier and faster for foreign sellers to ship products directly to U.S. consumers while avoiding proper due diligence.

"De minimus entries" are specifically harmful because:
...


More:
 
Markets heading up today. Rumors that domestic retail for precious metals are net buying again. Looks like the #squeeze is on.

China resumes trading tonight as their week long holiday is ending. Interesting times!
 
Forget where I read it, but somebody suggested PLTR yesterday because of AI.

big.gif

found it

 
Back
Top Bottom