- Messages
- 12,219
- Reaction score
- 8,432
- Points
- 238
Probably need a peer reviewed study to prove that because correlation doesn't equal causation... might take another 2 years though....^^^ more fascism.
Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more. You can visit the forum page to see the list of forum nodes (categories/rooms) for topics.
Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!
Probably need a peer reviewed study to prove that because correlation doesn't equal causation... might take another 2 years though....^^^ more fascism.
Today's Main Event: Man Of God vs Werewolf
So the Werewolf won, eh?Called for Senator Raphael Warnock.
So the Werewolf won, eh?
The Reverend won.
The "Reverend" title doesn't mean anything. Remember Obama's preacher ("God damn America" and all that crap)? LOL!
Let's see how he votes in Congress. That will tell you more.
.
He spent the last 2 years in congress.
I heard that Kari showed up for court but Katie did not...
It's worked for 260 years.Congress approves new election rules in Jan. 6 response
Story by By NICHOLAS RICCARDI, Associated Press • 37m ago
Congress on Friday gave final passage to legislation changing the arcane law that governs the certification of a presidential contest, the strongest effort yet to avoid a repeat of Donald Trump's violence-inflaming push to reverse his loss in the 2020 election.
The House passed an overhaul of the Electoral Count Act as part of its massive, end-of-the-year spending bill, after the Senate approved identical wording Thursday. The legislation now goes to President Joe Biden for his signature.
Biden hailed the provisions' inclusion in the spending bill in a statement Friday, calling it “critical bipartisan action that will help ensure that the will of the people is preserved.”
More:
The thing they offer is to ban guns.
It'll work just like the way they want abortion to go. Except in reverse.
With abortion they wamt no restrictions, and with guns they want full restriction.
Ie: they can't be happy with the many gun restrictions they already have gotten over the past 90 years. They won't rest until they have an outright ban on them and only criminals have them.
....and with abortions it started with, "we only want it in the first trimester". Now it's, "we want to kill 'em right up to the day of a full term delivery.
The US is a corporation"Sorry. As a citizen, you have no standing with the Court. Piss off."
One wonders what, or who that might be?The office is vacant, as much so as though the appointee were dead; there is no incumbent, and the vacancy may be filled by the proper appointive power .
Why would you leave out stuff he said?Former President Donald Trump blamed pro-life Republicans for the party's lackluster performance in the 2022 midterm elections, rejecting any blame on Monday.
Trump faced heavy criticism following midterm elections after Trump-endorsed candidates lost key close races across the country. Many commentators argued Trump had forced the party to put up bad candidates, but Trump now argues it was the fault of staunchly pro-life Republicans.
"It wasn't my fault that the Republicans didn't live up to expectations in the midterms," Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. "It was the ‘abortion issue,’ poorly handled by many Republicans, especially those that firmly insisted on No Exceptions, even in the case of rape, incest or life of the mother, that lost large numbers of voters."
MSN
www.msn.com
Well that right there gets rid of all the dems and at least 7/8ths of the repubs.The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "no state legislator or executive or
judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking
to support it".
Indeed. On purpose? Or just unaware?
Why would you leave out stuff he said?