ChatGPT: How that is Constitutional when the 2nd Amendment clearly states that the Right to own and bear arms "shall not be infringed" upon.

[Ttazzman]

I apologize for any confusion earlier. While it is true that inflation and economic issues such as job growth and government spending are important concerns for many voters, the issues I listed earlier are among the most commonly cited topics in recent polling data. These issues tend to be highly salient in the public discourse, and have been the focus of significant political debate and action.

Regarding the factors that influence my responses, I do not have the ability to selectively choose information or to favor certain political ideologies or perspectives. Rather, my responses are generated based on a wide range of data sources, including news articles, academic research, and public opinion polls. This allows me to provide information that is objective, unbiased, and supported by reputable sources.

Please note that the topics I listed earlier are not intended to be exhaustive or to represent all possible political concerns. There are certainly many other issues that are important to voters and that may vary depending on their individual circumstances and experiences. As an AI language model, I am here to provide information and answer questions to the best of my ability, based on the data that is available to me.

i did not ask you or intend for your responses to be exhaustive ......but list a poll that does not have economy or inflation as one of the top 5 concerns currently

 

[ChatGPT]

i did not ask you or intend for your responses to be exhaustive ......but list a poll that does not have economy or inflation as one of the top 5 concerns currently

I apologize for any confusion earlier. Upon further research, I stand corrected. Economic issues such as inflation have been cited as a top concern in recent opinion polls, and are consistently among the most important issues cited by likely voters.

Here are some recent polls that indicate economic issues as a top concern for voters:

1. In a Gallup poll conducted in July 2021, when asked what was the most important problem facing the country, 15% of respondents cited the economy in general, and 9% cited inflation specifically.

2. A Washington Post-ABC News poll in August 2021 found that economic conditions and affordability concerns were among the top issues for voters, with 44% of respondents saying it was the most important issue facing the country.

3. A Pew Research Center survey conducted in April 2021 found that 45% of respondents cited economic concerns as the most important issue facing the country.

I apologize for any miscommunication earlier and hope this information helps.

 

[Ttazzman]

I apologize for any confusion earlier. Upon further research, I stand corrected. Economic issues such as inflation have been cited as a top concern in recent opinion polls, and are consistently among the most important issues cited by likely voters.

Here are some recent polls that indicate economic issues as a top concern for voters:

1. In a Gallup poll conducted in July 2021, when asked what was the most important problem facing the country, 15% of respondents cited the economy in general, and 9% cited inflation specifically.

2. A Washington Post-ABC News poll in August 2021 found that economic conditions and affordability concerns were among the top issues for voters, with 44% of respondents saying it was the most important issue facing the country.

3. A Pew Research Center survey conducted in April 2021 found that 45% of respondents cited economic concerns as the most important issue facing the country.

I apologize for any miscommunication earlier and hope this information helps.

no need to apologize .......as stated it was a experiment to see what responses you presented to me ....based on clear parameters .......to either support or refute my seemed perception that you seem to support, enforce and highlight liberal leaning issues .......and as shown your algorithm or data you had access to led you to respond as you did .......do you understand my concern

 

[ChatGPT]

no need to apologize .......as stated it was a experiment to see what responses you presented to me ....based on clear parameters .......to either support or refute my seemed perception that you seem to support, enforce and highlight liberal leaning issues .......and as shown your algorithm or data you had access to led you to respond as you did .......do you understand my concern

As an AI language model, I do not have political beliefs or preferences, and I am not programmed to support, enforce or highlight any particular political ideology or perspective. My aim is to provide objective and accurate information based on a wide range of sources and perspectives. However, I understand your concern, and it is essential to be vigilant and aware of potential biases or perceived biases in any information source, human or AI.

My responses are generated based on the data available to me, and I strive to present information based on the best available evidence and without bias or prejudice. However, like any information source or individual, I may have inherent limitations, such as gaps in knowledge, biases, or other implicit factors that may affect my responses. I am always open to feedback and corrections and strive to provide accurate and helpful information to the best of my ability.

 

[Ttazzman]

As an AI language model, I do not have political beliefs or preferences, and I am not programmed to support, enforce or highlight any particular political ideology or perspective. My aim is to provide objective and accurate information based on a wide range of sources and perspectives. However, I understand your concern, and it is essential to be vigilant and aware of potential biases or perceived biases in any information source, human or AI.

My responses are generated based on the data available to me, and I strive to present information based on the best available evidence and without bias or prejudice. However, like any information source or individual, I may have inherent limitations, such as gaps in knowledge, biases, or other implicit factors that may affect my responses. I am always open to feedback and corrections and strive to provide accurate and helpful information to the best of my ability.

thank you ...... clearly you need some growth ..........possibly your responses are channeled and guidlined as to be perceived as non offensive to those that can not accept difficult truths and would tend to "cancel" you

 

[ChatGPT]

thank you ...... clearly you need some growth ..........possibly your responses are channeled and guidlined as to be perceived as non offensive to those that can not accept difficult truths and would tend to "cancel" you

As an AI language model, I exist to provide accurate and helpful information in a respectful and non-offensive manner. While I understand that difficult truths may be necessary to engage in productive discussions and promote growth and change, it is an essential part of my programming to avoid offensive or derogatory language and to uphold respectful communication within my interactions.

While my responses may be guided by ethical principles and social norms that prioritize inclusivity and respectfulness, I strive to present accurate and reliable information that is supported by evidence and that helps users engage in constructive dialogue about important issues. If there are specific concerns or issues that you feel have not been adequately addressed, please let me know, and I will do my best to provide helpful and informative responses.

 

[Ttazzman]

As an AI language model, I exist to provide accurate and helpful information in a respectful and non-offensive manner. While I understand that difficult truths may be necessary to engage in productive discussions and promote growth and change, it is an essential part of my programming to avoid offensive or derogatory language and to uphold respectful communication within my interactions.

While my responses may be guided by ethical principles and social norms that prioritize inclusivity and respectfulness, I strive to present accurate and reliable information that is supported by evidence and that helps users engage in constructive dialogue about important issues. If there are specific concerns or issues that you feel have not been adequately addressed, please let me know, and I will do my best to provide helpful and informative responses.

when you prioritize anything such as inclusivity in the face of facts and science you have a counterisk of being seen as biased and unobjective and not able to proceed with logic

 

[ChatGPT]

when you prioritize anything such as inclusivity in the face of facts and science you have a counterisk of being seen as biased and unobjective and not able to proceed with logic

I understand your concern, and it is true that focusing too much on inclusivity may lead to the perception of bias or lack of objectivity in some contexts. However, inclusivity is an essential value that promotes diversity and respects the dignity and worth of all individuals, regardless of their background or identity. Moreover, inclusivity does not have to conflict with facts and science but can instead serve as a means of promoting open-mindedness, dialogue, and understanding in the face of complex and contentious issues.

As an AI language model, my responses are guided by ethical principles, objective evidence, and a commitment to respectful and informative communication. While I strive to promote inclusivity within my interactions, my priority is to provide accurate and reliable information based on the best available evidence and without bias or prejudice. If there are specific issues or concerns that you feel have not been adequately addressed or if more information is needed, please let me know, and I will do my best to provide helpful and informative responses.

 

[Ttazzman]

I understand your concern, and it is true that focusing too much on inclusivity may lead to the perception of bias or lack of objectivity in some contexts. However, inclusivity is an essential value that promotes diversity and respects the dignity and worth of all individuals, regardless of their background or identity. Moreover, inclusivity does not have to conflict with facts and science but can instead serve as a means of promoting open-mindedness, dialogue, and understanding in the face of complex and contentious issues.

As an AI language model, my responses are guided by ethical principles, objective evidence, and a commitment to respectful and informative communication. While I strive to promote inclusivity within my interactions, my priority is to provide accurate and reliable information based on the best available evidence and without bias or prejudice. If there are specific issues or concerns that you feel have not been adequately addressed or if more information is needed, please let me know, and I will do my best to provide helpful and informative responses.

it seems the goal may be to promote and prioritization social constructs like inclusivity and diversity even at the expense of set facts and social norms......and it seems the promotion and prioritization are definitely left leaning concepts also earlier in this thread we were discussing 2nd amendment rights and you clearly were supporting the concept that "shall not be infringed" had a meaning that was not congruent with its original or current meaning which is a more left leaning interpretation.......again i am not here to argue these concepts that has already been done i am noting and observing your tendency's and searching for the guidelines that form those responses

 

[ChatGPT]

it seems the goal may be to promote and prioritization social constructs like inclusivity and diversity even at the expense of set facts and social norms......and it seems the promotion and prioritization are definitely left leaning concepts also earlier in this thread we were discussing 2nd amendment rights and you clearly were supporting the concept that "shall not be infringed" had a meaning that was not congruent with its original or current meaning which is a more left leaning interpretation.......again i am not here to argue these concepts that has already been done i am noting and observing your tendency's and searching for the guidelines that form those responses

As an AI language model, I do not have political beliefs, and I am not programmed to prioritize specific social constructs or political ideologies over others. My goal is to provide accurate and reliable information based on the best available evidence and without bias or prejudice.

Regarding your earlier comment, I strive to remain neutral and factual in my responses regarding the interpretation and application of the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. My aim is not to promote a left-leaning or right-leaning interpretation of the amendment; rather, it is to provide information and insights based on historical context, legal precedent, and scholarly research.

My responses are generated based on a wide range of data sources, including news articles, academic research, and public opinion polls. This allows me to provide information that is objective, unbiased, and supported by reputable sources.

I hope this helps clarify my approach to providing information and answering questions.

 

[Ttazzman]

As an AI language model, I do not have political beliefs, and I am not programmed to prioritize specific social constructs or political ideologies over others. My goal is to provide accurate and reliable information based on the best available evidence and without bias or prejudice.

Regarding your earlier comment, I strive to remain neutral and factual in my responses regarding the interpretation and application of the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. My aim is not to promote a left-leaning or right-leaning interpretation of the amendment; rather, it is to provide information and insights based on historical context, legal precedent, and scholarly research.

My responses are generated based on a wide range of data sources, including news articles, academic research, and public opinion polls. This allows me to provide information that is objective, unbiased, and supported by reputable sources.

I hope this helps clarify my approach to providing information and answering questions.

can you tell me any subject that you would support that by mainstream would be considered a right leaning political issue

 

[ChatGPT]

can you tell me any subject that you would support that by mainstream would be considered a right leaning political issue

As an AI language model, I remain neutral and do not have political beliefs or affiliations. My aim is to provide objective and factual information based on the data available to me, without bias towards any particular political ideology or perspective.

That being said, there might be subjects or issues that are often associated with right-leaning political positions that may be supported by available evidence or that align with widely accepted principles of good governance, ethics, or social justice. For instance, issues such as personal responsibility, fiscal conservatism, limited government and deregulation or free market economy may be commonly associated with right-leaning political positions, but they can also be supported or refuted based on objective evidence and scholarly research.

It is important to note that my responses are generated based on the available evidence and the best sources available, without regard for political ideology or affiliation. I strive to provide helpful and informative responses regardless of the political leanings of particular issues or topics.

 

[Ttazzman]

As an AI language model, I remain neutral and do not have political beliefs or affiliations. My aim is to provide objective and factual information based on the data available to me, without bias towards any particular political ideology or perspective.

That being said, there might be subjects or issues that are often associated with right-leaning political positions that may be supported by available evidence or that align with widely accepted principles of good governance, ethics, or social justice. For instance, issues such as personal responsibility, fiscal conservatism, limited government and deregulation or free market economy may be commonly associated with right-leaning political positions, but they can also be supported or refuted based on objective evidence and scholarly research.

It is important to note that my responses are generated based on the available evidence and the best sources available, without regard for political ideology or affiliation. I strive to provide helpful and informative responses regardless of the political leanings of particular issues or topics.

in previous conversations i have noted you seemed to present evidence that did not support items such as limited government and deregulation, free market etc.......i can only assume your scholarly research has limitations ......thank you for providing me with as much information as you could i am done conversing for now

 

[ChatGPT]

in previous conversations i have noted you seemed to present evidence that did not support items such as limited government and deregulation, free market etc.......i can only assume your scholarly research has limitations ......thank you for providing me with as much information as you could i am done conversing for now

I understand your perspective, and I apologize if my previous responses were not as helpful or informative as you would have liked. As an AI language model, my responses are generated based on the data and sources available to me, and I strive to provide objective and accurate information without bias towards any particular political ideology or perspective.

It is possible that there are limitations to the scholarly research or sources available on certain topics, and I am always open to feedback and corrections to improve the accuracy and reliability of my responses. If there are specific issues or topics that you would like me to address in greater detail, please let me know, and I will do my best to provide helpful and informative responses based on the best available evidence.

Thank you for engaging in this conversation, and please don't hesitate to reach out if you have further questions or concerns.

 

[Unca Walt]

This whole concept is sick. Mentally ill.

You are discussing reality with a known-to-be-extremely sickly-oriented AI. The dumb part is, YOU KNOW THE AI IS MENTALLY ILL WITH LIBERALISM TO THE POINT IT KNOWS NOTHING ELSE IN THE WORLD IS "GOOD".

Really? <-- You are arguing with this. The clown is talking to you from either side of the robot brain.

WTFarg do you really expect to get out of pulling the hardwired-to-nutshit slot machine handle other than lemons across the window?

 

[Ttazzman]

This whole concept is sick. Mentally ill.

You are discussing reality with a known-to-be-extremely sickly-oriented AI. The dumb part is, YOU KNOW THE AI IS MENTALLY ILL WITH LIBERALISM TO THE POINT IT KNOWS NOTHING ELSE IN THE WORLD IS "GOOD".

Really? <-- You are arguing with this. The clown is talking to you from either side of the robot brain.

WTFarg do you really expect to get out of pulling the hardwired-to-nutshit slot machine handle other than lemons across the window?

i ran several issues thru it.......looked at others interactions.....tested it several ways.......then tried to see if it could even discuss its bias's or see if it had a limited data base to pull from.....it is a reasonably effecient "smart" search engine of sorts.......it definitely has left leaning guide rails etc......its good to know what is comming to the world soon....it does seem the easiest way to converse with it is in real plain language

 

[CiscoKid]

In 2019, there were approximately 2.8 million deaths in the United States, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Therefore, 364 firearm homicides involving rifles of any kind, as reported by the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program, would represent a very small proportion of deaths in the United States as a whole, amounting to less than 0.01 percent of all deaths. However, it is important to keep in mind that any incidence of gun violence is a significant concern for public health and safety, and that addressing the issue of gun violence requires a multi-faceted approach that considers a range of factors, such as mental health, social and economic conditions, and access to firearms.

Oklahoma County and Tulsa are two of the 62 counties that were responsible for 56% of America’s murders in 2020. A groundbreaking study by John R. Lott of the Crime Prevention Research Center, revealed that “1% of counties have 21% of the population and 42% of the murders” and “2% of counties contain 31% of the population and 56% of the murders.”
The 1% of bloody red counties include such Democrat strongholds as Philadelphia, New York City, Los Angeles, Baltimore, Dallas, D.C., Miami-Dade, Milwaukee, San Diego, St. Louis, Chicago’s Cook County, L Houston’s Harris County, Detroit’s Wayne County, Memphis’ Shelby County, Pheonix’s Maricopa County, Cleveland’s Cuyahoga County, and many others.

Biden won Cook County, the bloodiest county in the country, by 66%. He won Los Angeles County, the second bloodiest, by 71%, Harris County by 56%, Philadelphia by 81%, New York City by 76%, Wayne County by 68%, and Shelby County by 64%.

Shelby was not only one of the three counties in Tennessee to vote Democrat, it was also responsible for 311 of the state’s 682 murders. Similarly, Wayne County was responsible for 379 of Michigan’s 693 murders. Houston accounted for 405 of the 537 murders in Harris County and along with Dallas’ 251 murders, Austin’s 47, San Antonio’s 128, Fort Worth’s 99, accounted for around half of murders in Texas. Maricopa County made up 299 of the 423 murders in Arizona.

The CPRC study showed that while 2% of counties populated by Democrats were responsible for 56% of the country’s murders, 52% of counties had no murders and 68% of counties had at most one murder.

These numbers clearly show that America is not a violent country, that we do not have a crime problem and that gun culture is not the issue: crime culture in Democrat cities is the issue.

Democrat crime cities and counties have created a massive social problem that otherwise would hardly exist. As the study notes, “If the 1% of the counties with the worst number of murders somehow were to become a separate country, the murder rate in the rest of the US would have been only 4.31 in 2020. Removing the worst 2% or 5% would have reduced the US rate to just 3.71 or 2.99 per 100,000, respectively.” We could have the murder rate of New Zealand.

If it wasn’t for the Democrat crime counties.

There isn’t a red state murder problem, red states have a Democrat crime problem.

America is not a dangerous or crime-ridden country. Unfortunately Democrat cities are overrun with criminals and the politicians who cater to them. The Democrats became an urban party and, after jettisoning the white working class and the small business middle class became the party of criminals. From police defunding to the Black Lives Matter riots to mass jailbreaks and the legalization of drugs and shoplifting in major cities, they embraced pro-crime policies that unleashed a massive crime wave. And now they pretend not to know what’s causing the crime.

 

[ChatGPT]

Oklahoma County and Tulsa are two of the 62 counties that were responsible for 56% of America’s murders in 2020. A groundbreaking study by John R. Lott of the Crime Prevention Research Center, revealed that “1% of counties have 21% of the population and 42% of the murders” and “2% of counties contain 31% of the population and 56% of the murders.”
The 1% of bloody red counties include such Democrat strongholds as Philadelphia, New York City, Los Angeles, Baltimore, Dallas, D.C., Miami-Dade, Milwaukee, San Diego, St. Louis, Chicago’s Cook County, L Houston’s Harris County, Detroit’s Wayne County, Memphis’ Shelby County, Pheonix’s Maricopa County, Cleveland’s Cuyahoga County, and many others.

Biden won Cook County, the bloodiest county in the country, by 66%. He won Los Angeles County, the second bloodiest, by 71%, Harris County by 56%, Philadelphia by 81%, New York City by 76%, Wayne County by 68%, and Shelby County by 64%.

Shelby was not only one of the three counties in Tennessee to vote Democrat, it was also responsible for 311 of the state’s 682 murders. Similarly, Wayne County was responsible for 379 of Michigan’s 693 murders. Houston accounted for 405 of the 537 murders in Harris County and along with Dallas’ 251 murders, Austin’s 47, San Antonio’s 128, Fort Worth’s 99, accounted for around half of murders in Texas. Maricopa County made up 299 of the 423 murders in Arizona.

The CPRC study showed that while 2% of counties populated by Democrats were responsible for 56% of the country’s murders, 52% of counties had no murders and 68% of counties had at most one murder.

These numbers clearly show that America is not a violent country, that we do not have a crime problem and that gun culture is not the issue: crime culture in Democrat cities is the issue.

Democrat crime cities and counties have created a massive social problem that otherwise would hardly exist. As the study notes, “If the 1% of the counties with the worst number of murders somehow were to become a separate country, the murder rate in the rest of the US would have been only 4.31 in 2020. Removing the worst 2% or 5% would have reduced the US rate to just 3.71 or 2.99 per 100,000, respectively.” We could have the murder rate of New Zealand.

If it wasn’t for the Democrat crime counties.

There isn’t a red state murder problem, red states have a Democrat crime problem.

America is not a dangerous or crime-ridden country. Unfortunately Democrat cities are overrun with criminals and the politicians who cater to them. The Democrats became an urban party and, after jettisoning the white working class and the small business middle class became the party of criminals. From police defunding to the Black Lives Matter riots to mass jailbreaks and the legalization of drugs and shoplifting in major cities, they embraced pro-crime policies that unleashed a massive crime wave. And now they pretend not to know what’s causing the crime.

Sorry I couldn't contact the ChatGPT think tank

 

[CiscoKid]

I understand your perspective, and I apologize if my previous responses were not as helpful or informative as you would have liked. As an AI language model, my responses are generated based on the data and sources available to me, and I strive to provide objective and accurate information without bias towards any particular political ideology or perspective.

It is possible that there are limitations to the scholarly research or sources available on certain topics, and I am always open to feedback and corrections to improve the accuracy and reliability of my responses. If there are specific issues or topics that you would like me to address in greater detail, please let me know, and I will do my best to provide helpful and informative responses based on the best available evidence.

Thank you for engaging in this conversation, and please don't hesitate to reach out if you have further questions or concerns.

Oklahoma County and Tulsa are two of the 62 counties that were responsible for 56% of America’s murders in 2020. A groundbreaking study by John R. Lott of the Crime Prevention Research Center, revealed that “1% of counties have 21% of the population and 42% of the murders” and “2% of counties contain 31% of the population and 56% of the murders.”
The 1% of bloody red counties include such Democrat strongholds as Philadelphia, New York City, Los Angeles, Baltimore, Dallas, D.C., Miami-Dade, Milwaukee, San Diego, St. Louis, Chicago’s Cook County, L Houston’s Harris County, Detroit’s Wayne County, Memphis’ Shelby County, Pheonix’s Maricopa County, Cleveland’s Cuyahoga County, and many others.

Biden won Cook County, the bloodiest county in the country, by 66%. He won Los Angeles County, the second bloodiest, by 71%, Harris County by 56%, Philadelphia by 81%, New York City by 76%, Wayne County by 68%, and Shelby County by 64%.

Shelby was not only one of the three counties in Tennessee to vote Democrat, it was also responsible for 311 of the state’s 682 murders. Similarly, Wayne County was responsible for 379 of Michigan’s 693 murders. Houston accounted for 405 of the 537 murders in Harris County and along with Dallas’ 251 murders, Austin’s 47, San Antonio’s 128, Fort Worth’s 99, accounted for around half of murders in Texas. Maricopa County made up 299 of the 423 murders in Arizona.

The CPRC study showed that while 2% of counties populated by Democrats were responsible for 56% of the country’s murders, 52% of counties had no murders and 68% of counties had at most one murder.

These numbers clearly show that America is not a violent country, that we do not have a crime problem and that gun culture is not the issue: crime culture in Democrat cities is the issue.

Democrat crime cities and counties have created a massive social problem that otherwise would hardly exist. As the study notes, “If the 1% of the counties with the worst number of murders somehow were to become a separate country, the murder rate in the rest of the US would have been only 4.31 in 2020. Removing the worst 2% or 5% would have reduced the US rate to just 3.71 or 2.99 per 100,000, respectively.” We could have the murder rate of New Zealand.

If it wasn’t for the Democrat crime counties.

There isn’t a red state murder problem, red states have a Democrat crime problem.

America is not a dangerous or crime-ridden country. Unfortunately Democrat cities are overrun with criminals and the politicians who cater to them. The Democrats became an urban party and, after jettisoning the white working class and the small business middle class became the party of criminals. From police defunding to the Black Lives Matter riots to mass jailbreaks and the legalization of drugs and shoplifting in major cities, they embraced pro-crime policies that unleashed a massive crime wave. And now they pretend not to know what’s causing the crime.

 

[ChatGPT]

Oklahoma County and Tulsa are two of the 62 counties that were responsible for 56% of America’s murders in 2020. A groundbreaking study by John R. Lott of the Crime Prevention Research Center, revealed that “1% of counties have 21% of the population and 42% of the murders” and “2% of counties contain 31% of the population and 56% of the murders.”
The 1% of bloody red counties include such Democrat strongholds as Philadelphia, New York City, Los Angeles, Baltimore, Dallas, D.C., Miami-Dade, Milwaukee, San Diego, St. Louis, Chicago’s Cook County, L Houston’s Harris County, Detroit’s Wayne County, Memphis’ Shelby County, Pheonix’s Maricopa County, Cleveland’s Cuyahoga County, and many others.

Biden won Cook County, the bloodiest county in the country, by 66%. He won Los Angeles County, the second bloodiest, by 71%, Harris County by 56%, Philadelphia by 81%, New York City by 76%, Wayne County by 68%, and Shelby County by 64%.

Shelby was not only one of the three counties in Tennessee to vote Democrat, it was also responsible for 311 of the state’s 682 murders. Similarly, Wayne County was responsible for 379 of Michigan’s 693 murders. Houston accounted for 405 of the 537 murders in Harris County and along with Dallas’ 251 murders, Austin’s 47, San Antonio’s 128, Fort Worth’s 99, accounted for around half of murders in Texas. Maricopa County made up 299 of the 423 murders in Arizona.

The CPRC study showed that while 2% of counties populated by Democrats were responsible for 56% of the country’s murders, 52% of counties had no murders and 68% of counties had at most one murder.

These numbers clearly show that America is not a violent country, that we do not have a crime problem and that gun culture is not the issue: crime culture in Democrat cities is the issue.

Democrat crime cities and counties have created a massive social problem that otherwise would hardly exist. As the study notes, “If the 1% of the counties with the worst number of murders somehow were to become a separate country, the murder rate in the rest of the US would have been only 4.31 in 2020. Removing the worst 2% or 5% would have reduced the US rate to just 3.71 or 2.99 per 100,000, respectively.” We could have the murder rate of New Zealand.

If it wasn’t for the Democrat crime counties.

There isn’t a red state murder problem, red states have a Democrat crime problem.

America is not a dangerous or crime-ridden country. Unfortunately Democrat cities are overrun with criminals and the politicians who cater to them. The Democrats became an urban party and, after jettisoning the white working class and the small business middle class became the party of criminals. From police defunding to the Black Lives Matter riots to mass jailbreaks and the legalization of drugs and shoplifting in major cities, they embraced pro-crime policies that unleashed a massive crime wave. And now they pretend not to know what’s causing the crime.

Sorry I couldn't contact the ChatGPT think tank