January 6 Insurrection

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

searcher said:
Will Fox and Carlson be facing another new big buck lawsuit soon?
Click to expand...

Probably, because these losers have nothing else to do. They are airing video evidence, nothing more. Which one would think would have been allowed to people who went on trial but not in the USSA is that allowed. What were the old courts of Joesph Stalin called again?
 
Last edited:

COMMERCIAL FREE REPLAY: Tucker Carlson Tonight, Jan 6th Video Released. Weeknights 8PM EST​

 
searcher said:
The R's are not happy......
Click to expand...
No, the D's in R's clothing are not happy.

Have you ever read the actual complaint against the Qanon "Shaman", as he has been labeled?

If you hadn't, no biggie. As I hadn't either.
.....but you should take a look at this meet Kevin vid. He reads the part of it where the gov describes his entry into the building. Take note of the part where it reads that "other people in the crowd" (ie: not the Shaman guy) broke two windows, gained entry and then opened a door between the two windows which at some point the Shaman guy walked through.

Granted, I certainly would not have walked through that door, had I been there and seen two guys break in and then open it.
...but merely walking through an open door hardly represents the "violent entry" he was charged with.
....and what about the two guys who actually DID break in violently? Who were they, what were they charged with? Have they been charged?

@searcher , would you not agree that if merely walking through a door warrants a charge of violent entry, shouldn't the two who did break in using violence be charged too? In your opinion, what should they be charged with?
....and don't you find it at least a bit odd that we hear nothing about those guys that they have on vid breaking in?

Keep in mind that Qanon Shaman guy has received more time than anyone else, and has been portrayed as the face of the "insurrection".

Shouldn't the guys who actually "broke in", be used as the face of the "insurrection"?
It would after all, make sense to use the most violent that were there.



The part where he reads the actual complaint isn't very far into the vid.


Edited to add: I gotta say, I get a kick outta seein' Kevin red pill himself. Lol



That they have video of people violently breaking in who they fail to ID and charge, but have instead chosen to throw the book at a guy that did nothing violent, should be enough to tell any reasonable and thinking person all they need to know about who the only truly violent people there that day, were.
 
Last edited:
How is it even trespassing when We The People pay for that building? I think our employees there by our grace, are trespassing now.
 
Viking said:
How is it even trespassing when We The People pay for that building? I think our employees there by our grace, are trespassing now.
Click to expand...
It shouldn't be. However, if you were to break a window in any other building and make entry when the door is locked, it would be a criminal act. Forced entry. Breaking and entering. Etc etc.
.....and the two guys who did that should be charged. Breaking windows is destruction of property, and we all know those windows are likely not cheap.
At the least, vandalism charges would be warranted, but afaik, the ones we see on vid actually being violent outside the capitol have not been id'ed or charged.
 
Duck & cover?

Tucker Carlson said he hates Trump ‘passionately’, Fox lawsuit documents show​

Among the documents released Tuesday as part of the $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit filed against Fox News by Dominion Voting Systems was an email from Fox Corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch to Fox News CEO Suzanne Scott that the organization was “Still getting mud thrown at us! … Maybe Sean and Laura went too far.”

Two months after the election and just days before Jan. 6, 2021, Fox host Tucker Carlson texted with an unknown Fox employee about how badly he wanted to stop covering President Donald Trump.
“We are very, very close to being able to ignore Trump most nights,” Carlson texted Jan. 4, 2021. “I truly can’t wait.”
“I hate him passionately,” Carlson added.

Here’s what to know: (i.e., believe what we want you to think?)
  • The newly unveiled exhibits show the extraordinary energy and attention devoted to mollifying Trump and his die-hard supporters in the days after Fox correctly called the election for Joe Biden.
  • Dominion alleges Fox knowingly aired false conspiracy theories that its voting machines had a role in Trump’s loss in the 2020 presidential election in a bid to boost ratings.
  • In a statement on Tuesday, Fox said Dominion used “distortions and misinformation” to smear Fox and claims quotes were misattributed.
 
Joe King said:
I gotta say, McCarthy is doing better than I originally thought he would.
Click to expand...
I noticed how the reporters attempted to get him to say the 'official version' wasn't true.

That explains the MSM today... they have the idea in their minds that what they say is gospel.

Woe unto you if you don't toe the 'official' line....
 

How likely do you think this whole lawsuit is just a cover it up sham? They come up with a back room deal between these two very shady corps to make it look like the elections are "fine". Then the "factcheckers" can come back and say see -> even the lawsuits found no fault. Meanwhile Faux news is reimbursed in some back room deal.
 
first part is about Tucker being a establishment stooge and his awakening.... he's interviewed by Glen Beck.
start at 5m mark

UNIPARTY EXPOSED AS J6 NARRATIVE CON TINIES TO CRUMBLE ON RED PILL NEWS LIVE​

Another bombshell reveal on Tucker Carlson as he c alls out the UNIPARTY alliance to trash Trump and America First over J6 and the fake news narrative.
90m
 

Attorney Who Defended 'QAnon Shaman' Says Gov't Never Gave Him Video Evidence​

The former attorney for Jacob Chansley, the “QAnon Shaman,” told Tucker Carlson Wednesday that he did not see certain videos until Carlson aired them.
By Harold Hutchison
Mar 09, 2023 02:34 AM
View original
The former attorney for Jacob Chansley, the “QAnon Shaman,” told Fox News host Tucker Carlson Wednesday that he did not see certain videos of Chansley in the Capitol building until Carlson aired them.

“The government knew through three hearings, when we begged and pleaded to get this man out of solitary confinement, literally falling into an abyss mentally, and through each of those three hearings, that government assistant U.S. Attorney, knew the most important aspect of that hearing was that Jake was not violent,” Albert Watkins, Chansley’s former defense attorney, told Carlson, a co-founder of the Daily Caller and honorary board member of the Daily Caller News Foundation.

Carlson aired video of the riot Monday night that showed Capitol Police officers escorting one protestor, the “QAnon shaman” through the halls of the building. Republican Rep. Kevin McCarthy of California, the speaker of the house provided Carlson access to over 41,000 hours of video footage of the Capitol riot, Axios reported.

Chansley was sentenced to 41 months in prison following the Capitol riot, CNN reported.

“The government knew. They knew that Jake had walked around with all these police officers. They had that video footage. I didn’t get it,” Watkins said. “It wasn’t disclosed to me. It wasn’t provided to me. I requested it. I filed the requisite pleadings for it. Whether I did or not, they had a duty, an absolute duty, with zero discretion to provide it to me so that I could share it with my client.”

George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley tweeted that Chansley’s current attorney, Bill Shipley, also had not seen the videos. Prosecutors are required to turn over potentially exculpatory evidence, according to a 7-2 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. Maryland.

“This is about our justice system being so compromised, the very integrity and core of that which we wore as a badge of honor for the entirety of our nation’s history has been rendered a vile disgusting mess by a Department of Justice that was running amok, and they didn’t share the video of my client, the footage of my client, with nine officers surrounding him peacefully, wandering about, trying to help him, trying to get him access to the Senate chamber,” Watkins told Carlson. “They didn’t because it didn’t fit their narrative. And but for you disclosing it, I don’t know where we’d be.”

The Department of Justice did not immediately respond to a request for comment from the DCNF.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

‘They Had A Duty’: Attorney Who Defended ‘QAnon Shaman’ Says Gov’t Never Gave Him Video Evidence

The former attorney for Jacob Chansley, the “QAnon Shaman,” told Tucker Carlson Wednesday that he did not see certain videos until Carlson aired them.
dailycaller.com
 
What gets me is the lack of action on the part of the defense attorneys to file mistrial (or whatever they call them) and show cause motions on behalf of the defendants immediately?

If it was my client I'd be on the court steps that morning arguing that the prosecution conspiratorially withheld exculpatory evidence in the cases. Pleas deals were made without fully informed defendants being able to examine the evidence.
 
Goldhedge said:
Chansley was sentenced to 41 months in prison following the Capitol riot, CNN reported.
Click to expand...
All for just walking through a door that the gov admits was opened by other people that they failed/refused to ID and prosecute.

@searcher , if Chansley got that much time (the most anyone had gotten for their actions that day) how come we haven't heard anything about the guys that they have on video breaking in and opening the door to begin with? Shouldn't that be a much bigger crime than merely walking through an open door?
 

Oh I'm sure he will or he should be disbarred.

But what about the Government stooges who denied those Legal requests? That's fraudulent fascism, so I'm sure nothing will happen to them and they face ZERO consequences.
 

Don't know how to answer.

I watched the insanity on MSNBC from the time Trump and others were on stage talking, watched the crowd head to the Capital Bldg, saw that some people were already there getting crazy, saw the bldg. breached and kept watching until it was over.

Watched every Jan 6 Committee "meeting" on tv and watched every review of the meetings. Obviously I have my own opinions on what happened based upon what I saw and heard. Nothing will change that.

I'm following the Dominion vs Fox lawsuit big time and have opinions on that.

Now we have someone (K. McCarthy) giving thousands of hours worth of tapes of Jan 6 to someone who is an expert at disinfo and that same disinfo dude is cherry picking segments of those tapes and showing them in a way that paints the insurrectionists in a good light.

I don't get why this is allowed to continue in the way it is. Something isn't right in Denmark and I don't know what it is.

Might sound crazy, but it is starting to look like a continuing series tv show. Where are the charges against the inciters? WTF???
 
searcher said:
Watched every Jan 6 Committee "meeting" on tv and watched every review of the meetings. Obviously I have my own opinions on what happened based upon what I saw and heard. Nothing will change that.
Click to expand...
I watched most of the melee as well. Reminds me of when 'so-called violent' Trump supporters were getting their asses kicked by 'peaceful protestors' as they were leaving Trump rallies for wearing a red hat. Trump supporters aren't violent.

"Watching every review of the meetings" - the ones that were carefully scripted to allow you to come to your own opinions? Those 'meetings'??

Knowing what I know now... I would change 'those opinions'.

"Cherry Picking"... LOL Posting actual video of what the J6 committee fought to hide... is that why Murdock put the kibosh on further releases of 'cherry picking' on Tucker's 'disinfo' show??

Kind of looks to me like the J6 committee has been spreading manure in our general direction for the last 3 years regarding what happened that day.

Kind of looks to me like the J6 committee was the ones who were 'cherry picking'... for 'disinfo' purposes, not Tucker. Otherwise, they wouldn't have buried those videos and hired professional TV producers to create an anti-Trump narrative.

searcher said:
Might sound crazy, but it is starting to look like a continuing series tv show.
Click to expand...
It's not like we weren't informed ahead of time...

(if you were paying attention that is... oh, you dismissed it as a 'Qanon Conspiracy'? Like the MSM told you to??)

"Enjoy the show." Q








 
Goldhedge said:









Click to expand...


It was ALWAYS a SHOW trial. Did you actually think those idiots would bother looking through evidence? That would just be a waste of time. Something these leeches don't like to do because, well they could be using tax payer money to party somewhere. They were there to create a narrative and nothing more.

I'm actually surprised a lot of people don't understand this fact.
 
Interesting read.

From the link:

Democrats have already missed their best opportunity to fix the structural flaws in democracy that allowed Donald Trump to become president, and then nearly overthrow the government, according to a secret report that eerily predicted the insurrection.

The 87-page document, which was produced weeks before the 2020 election by an advocacy group known as the Hub, warned that Trump would surely refuse to concede his defeat to Joe Biden and cautioned that militia and white supremacist groups would react violently to his loss, and outlined a series of fundamental changes Democrats should enact to preserve constitutional democracy, reported Politico.

MSN

www.msn.com
 

Democracy SUCKS, no need to save it.
 
and that never happened ...
 
searcher said:
saw that some people were already there getting crazy, saw the bldg. breached and kept watching until it was over.
Click to expand...
Yet none of those that actually broke in, received more jail time than a guy who merely walked through an open door?

Chansley, (the Shaman guy) was portrayed as having committed the crime of "violent entry". Shouldn't the people who actually did the breaking and entering be charged of a higher crime than someone who did not "break in"?

I'm asking you to rank the crimes by severity. Actually breaking in vs merely walking through an open door.


searcher said:
Watched every Jan 6 Committee "meeting" on tv and watched every review of the meetings.
Click to expand...
Watched "every" review? I bet you did not watch any of Fox News reviews of it. Lol



searcher said:
Obviously I have my own opinions on what happened based upon what I saw and heard. Nothing will change that.
Click to expand...
So knowing that the jan 6 committee themselves were not given access to any video showing exculpatory evidence, you still think that those "hearings" presented a factual representation of events that day?
....and were 100% on the up and up?

For two years straight they told us stuff that was thrown into doubt in under an hour.




Nothing was "painted'. All he did was to show people video of what happened inside the Capitol and of police interactions with who we were told was the most violent person there that day.

Ie: he showed us that we'd been lied to by our government.





searcher said:
I don't get why this is allowed to continue in the way it is. Something isn't right in Denmark and I don't know what it is.
Click to expand...
You sound like a prosecutor who doesn't want anyone seeing exculpatory evidence against your defendants. Lol


searcher said:
Might sound crazy, but it is starting to look like a continuing series tv show. Where are the charges against the inciters? WTF???
Click to expand...
What looked like a TV show was your beloved jan 6th "hearings", more accurately described as a kangaroo court. They allowed hearsay and innuendo as "evidence". Lol



searcher said:
Don't know how to answer.
Click to expand...
If you followed it everyday for two whole years and watched every review of it, how you can honestly say you cannot answer?


Goldhedge said:
Kind of looks to me like the J6 committee was the ones who were 'cherry picking'
Click to expand...
Absolutely they were. Were they not, we'd have already seen all the vids and there would have been nothing for Tucker to show.
.....but then they also would not have gotten big convictions against their political opponents. So they made a choice to deceive the public.



searcher said:
Democrats have already missed their best opportunity to fix the structural flaws in democracy that allowed Donald Trump to become president
Click to expand...
OMG! How can you think it is a political party's job to rig a system to keep certain persons from being elected to office?

That'd be actively denying fellow Americans (others with equal Rights to yourself) to choose their own representative to the government.

That's one of our (you and me) most basic Rights.
...but you want others to not have that Right?



searcher said:
according to a secret report that eerily predicted the insurrection.
Click to expand...
If anything, it was written by the agent provocateurs there under cover who actually instigated any actual violence there that day.
 
searcher said:
MSNBC - Rachel Maddow and crew.
Click to expand...
Ok, so the truth is that you watched biased coverage of hearings that reported what you wanted to hear.




Here is a short vid of Chansley's lawyers comments.




@searcher , as a fellow American, can you really not see how we were lied to? How it was an obvious violation of his Rights to have exculpatory evidence withheld from his defense?

Or better put, if it were your butt in a defendants chair, would you be ok with the gov withholding exculpatory evidence from you?
Edited to add: if you are ok with it being done to him, you need to be ok with it being done to you to. After all, you and he have the same exact Rights. Strip him of his and you strip away your own at the same time.


They told us he was violent, yet cannot provide any evidence that he was violent. They even withheld evidence showing him being the opposite of violent.
 
Goldhedge said:
.Oh, well... in that case carry on!
Click to expand...

Joe King said:
Ok, so the truth is that you watched biased coverage of hearings that reported what you wanted to hear.
Click to expand...

Figured that would give you a laugh.

Joe King said:
Or better put, if it were your butt in a defendants chair, would you be ok with the gov withholding exculpatory evidence from you?
Click to expand...

Experienced it personally many moons ago.

Withholding evidence, outright lies, phony witnesses. The whole shebang.

Thank god for juries who can see through bullshit.

One thing...........fuck words. Always go for proof. No proof............no conviction.

Also believe in reparations for anyone falsely accused by the cops or prosecutors. You shouldn't have to spend your own money to prove you are innocent.

Don't trust cops, prosecutors or judges. Our system of justice has been broken for a long time.

Joe King said:
how you can honestly say you cannot answer?
Click to expand...

With all the madness going on (Dominion Vs Fox, no charges against the instigators, this new release of vids, etc) I am starting to think something stinks.

If the DOJ has evidence to bring charges............why haven't they charged anyone yet?

I'm starting to think it's time to shit or get off the pot.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…