Why the Meta-Facebook-Threads effort to make language safe is so dangerous
Why the Meta-Facebook-Threads effort to make language safe is so dangerous
public.substack.com
They don't seem to learn.
I remember the (relatively) early days of the InterwebZ, back around 1998. Earthlink was a new service in a new market - a series of dial-up modem batteries in most major urban regions. You used the toll-free number (programmed in the Earthlink software on Macs and probably Windows 98s, too) and it walked you through the setup to find the best local number for your area. Also gave you an account, for of course, a card purchase.
And you got a monthly magazine, too. For real! The ISP mailed out a glossy dead-tree artifact each month, with Sky Dayton (founder and CEO) writing a back-page editorial.
Whether he wrote them or not, they were well written, if a bit promotional.
One I remembered, was how he compared Earthlink's continued rise with AOL's (then) stagnant member numbers. He postulated why: Earthlink, gave the user the whole of the Internet. Back then it was two protocols: the Worldwide Web and UseNet. Plus of course, email - and Earthlink gave users an email box and program (web-based email was a few years away).
AOL gave users a PLAYPEN. Bad words were greyed out, if accessed from a non-AOL page. Many sites couldn't be visited. ONLY "approved" sites that America Online was confident of, could be accessed. Most of them, commercial.
Back then there were some veterans' sites, and some commentary sites, that AOL wouldn't let a user visit. I had a hack to use AOL when traveling - before Wi-Fi was everywhere. Earthlink wasn't portable. But I couldn't access Col. David Hackworth's weekly diatribes, nor some sardoni-laced editorial sites.
Point is: People rebelled against their content feed being curated, screened or censored...BY ANYONE. They DO NOT WANT that.
But the tech fields now are populated with young people who are Leftist; who are autistic; who are overpaid and who think they know better than us mere mortals.
They will again have to learn. This time, it will be, I think, a wholesale repudiation of the Web.
People are starting. There just isn't any reason to read or view material, when it all adds up to a political-party newspaper.