Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.
Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!
Russia has said that the US bears “primary responsibility” for what it claimed was a deliberate Ukrainian missile strike against civilians in the Russian-occupied city of Sevastopol.
Six people were killed - including two children - in the incident, as Russian air defences attempted to intercept long-range US-made Atacms missiles, Russian officials and Moscow’s ministry of defence said.
The Russian defence ministry said that the missiles hit by its air defence systems were armed with cluster munition warheads. Ukrainian officials have not commented.
Footage posted on social media showed missile fragments hitting beach areas in the north of the city, spraying sunbathing tourists with shrapnel.
There is no evidence Ukraine deliberately targeted the beach, which lies about ten minutes from a military airfield. However, daytime missile strikes by Ukraine are rare.
The Russian defence ministry said: “All flight missions for American ATACMS operational-tactical missiles are entered by American specialists based on their own US satellite intelligence data.
“Therefore, responsibility for the deliberate missile strike on civilians in Sevastopol lies primarily with Washington, which supplied these weapons to Ukraine, as well as the Kiev regime, from whose territory this strike was launched.
“Such actions will not go unanswered.”
...
Apparently, the Ukies aren't able to use the satellite guidance system to target civilians with those missiles.
Still, cluster munitions are considered a war crime... (that is if they're "Petal Mines"... I believe...).From what I read, Russian officials stated that the missiles were targeting a military base close to the beach. Russian defenses destroyed 4 incoming missiles and a fifth missile went wonky and exploded in the air which rained the debris on the beach. The missiles were not targeting the civilians/beach.
Any idea of just how close?targeting a military base close to the beach.
Any idea of just how close? ...
Recordings have appeared online after Sunday’s shelling of Sevastopol. The strike by a Russian anti-aircraft interceptor caused one of the ATACMS missiles to veer off course and explode on the beach, injuring 150 people.
A film recorded by a tourist on the beach shows a missile appearing over the nearby city of Sevastopol. Moments later, the missile explodes, and fragments fall on the sand with a thud.
Two other films show tourists using sun loungers to carry the injured off the beach. Women are trying to provide first aid.
The beach where the missile crashed is located about 10 minutes from Belbek Airport, from which Russia regularly launches fighters that attack civilian infrastructure in Ukraine.
...
Got a link to what you read?From what I read, Russian officials stated that the missiles were targeting a military base close to the beach. Russian defenses destroyed 4 incoming missiles and a fifth missile went wonky and exploded in the air which rained the debris on the beach. The missiles were not targeting the civilians/beach.
The military target in close proximity should be easily identified then...You have to be the the most propaganda minded partisan to assume/conclude that the missiles were targeting civilian infrastructure when there are military targets in close proximity and everyone knows Ukraine can't afford to waste ammunition.
Don't bother. There was maybe a minute of some guy and some part of the missile. Some of that was not in focus. That's it.Putin Has The Last Laugh: U.S.-made ATACMS' Guidance System Falls In Russia's Hands Amid Ukraine War
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?