Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more. You can visit the forum page to see the list of forum nodes (categories/rooms) for topics.
Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!
Is this inflationary...? ...
Changes to how the Federal Reserve manages one of world’s most crucial piles of assets pose “underappreciated” risks to financial markets, BlackRock warned in a Friday client note.
The Fed in early May said it plans to switch up how quickly it will look to shrink its $7.3 trillion balance sheet beginning June 1, a move that was “barely a side note” in financial markets, according to Tom Becker, portfolio manager at BlackRock’s Global Tactical Asset Allocation team.
But it was not a minor development in the eyes of BlackRock BLK, +0.56%, which held a record $10.5 trillion in assets in the first quarter, further entrenching it as the world’s largest asset manager.
The Fed said its “quantitative-tightening” program will soon allow only up to $25 billion of maturing Treasury securities to roll off its balance sheet each month, instead of the previous $60 billion cap.
Any proceeds from maturing mortgage-backed securities (MBS) above the $35 billion monthly cap for those assets also would be reinvested into Treasurys.
Yet it’s the makeup of the Fed’s balance sheet and not the “size that matters,” according to Becker. “The composition of the balance sheet today is likely suppressing 10-year [Treasury] BX:TMUBMUSD10Y yields by over 2% and potentially by as much as 4%,” he wrote. The benchmark 10-year rate was near 4.42% on Friday, down from a recent high of 4.7%.
If the “economy continues to expand strong and inflation remains sticky, we see a growing chance that future tightening discussions could involve altering the composition of balance-sheet holdings,” Becker added.
...
“Transitioning to a shorter-duration balance sheet would likely drive up long-dated government-bond yields and be negative” for the U.S. dollar DXY, Becker wrote, ...
...
Good point. that's less than 2% of total US debtDoes 53b tbill selling really matter considering the volume of tbills and debt being generated.....
Does 53b tbill selling really matter considering the volume of tbills and debt being generated.....
COT report from May 14 shows commercials now short 122,954 contracts or over 614 million ounces.
I can't even imagine losing 1.2 billion. Gotta be JPM with trillions that can handle a loss like that.So assuming they hung in there through Friday they lost almost $1.2 Billion dollars on Friday alone. thats gotta sting a bit ehh?
i figure about 10am cst tomorrow after all the traders have had their coffee we will find out how much depth is in this move or if its just a smoke puff in the wind...........i suspect shorters and profit takers are revvin their engines ......a few large margin calls might help us .....certainly going to be a interesting next few days ......they had all weekend to talk to their banker buddies and formulate a plan LOLSilver is $32.31 right now ... Will it hit $33 before the market even opens in the morning?
I thought LBMA could cover a 4 year deficit? I also imagine that a lot of miners who have reserves that aren't profitable at 20 an ounce to mine suddenly can make lower grades work with higher prices. That may help increase production but I'll admit I am no mining analyst, so I don't know that for a fact.I imagine the desk jockeys want to play the game, but how many of them are seeing the big picture (doing real risk analysis)? The current price action is not being driven by the West's futures markets any more. There is real and significant physical demand from China and India that is driving the bus now. LBMA+COMEX vaults are draining (with ~2 years left of available supply). Shorting now will only lead to a massive short squeeze later.
I thought LBMA could cover a 4 year deficit? I also imagine that a lot of miners who have reserves that aren't profitable at 20 an ounce to mine suddenly can make lower grades work with higher prices. That may help increase production but I'll admit I am no mining analyst, so I don't know that for a fact.
... the market is headed for a fourth year in deficit, with this year’s shortage seen as the second biggest on record.
That’s led industrial users — which typically rely on miners for supply — to seek ounces by draining the world’s major inventories, according to Silver Bullion’s Gregersen. Stockpiles tracked by the London Bullion Market Association fell to the second-lowest level on record in April, while the volumes at exchanges in New York and Shanghai are near seasonal lows.
Over the next two years, the LBMA stockpiles may be depleted given the current pace of demand, according to TD Securities. ...
Last I looked LBMA had like 850 million ounces on hand and was getting drained by 200 million a year. However I also dont follow it that closely so that's where my numbers are coming from and that is several months old for sure.BTW, if LBMA + COMEX vaults do drain to zero and the structural deficit remains, silver supply will be 100% dependent upon new mining supply (and scrap recycling which is minimal). Last I heard, new mining supply for silver is 7:1 for gold mining. Should the economics hold out, a GSR of ~7 would imply a silver price at ~$345/toz given gold currently at ~$2,420/toz. I don't expect silver to get there immediately or in a straight line, but that's a potential ceiling to watch over the next few years should the LBMA+COMEX vaults get drained.
Last I looked LBMA had like 850 million ounces on hand ...
LBMA - As at end April 2024, ... There were also 25,470 tonnes of silver ... SLV report for 9 May claims 320.8 mtoz vaulted in London. That leaves a total of 498.1 mtoz of silver in the London vaults not owned by ETFs. ...
as of the last hr profit takers are working on the price.......soon to see if the shorters jump on the bandwagon LOL.......we shall seeDoesn't appear that Maxwell's Silver Hammer did any damage.... hmmmm, no 'ammo' left??
i would say when hasnt there been silver to the moon bells chiming out thereGeez, now I’m seeing calls for $50+ silver this year, 90 by next year. This just went from “is silver in a bull market?” To “to the moon” instantly.
I guess in the silver market, it’s one or the other
And why isn’t lancers the one to point this out instead of me?
Geez, now I’m seeing calls for $50+ silver this year, 90 by next year. This just went from “is silver in a bull market?” To “to the moon” instantly.
I guess in the silver market, it’s one or the other
And why isn’t lancers the one to point this out instead of me?
Damn straight!Geez, now I’m seeing calls for $50+ silver this year, 90 by next year. This just went from “is silver in a bull market?” To “to the moon” instantly.
I guess in the silver market, it’s one or the other
And why isn’t lancers the one to point this out instead of me?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?