Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.
Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!
Ok you you dumb bitches, the Constitution DOES allow for criminal and treasonous acts to be prosecuted. You just have PROVE that treason was actually committed, and that the crimes are a high crime. You don't just get to say they are treasonous and criminal acts.(Sotomayor/Kagan/Jackson) Because our Constitution does not shield a former President from answering for criminal and treasonous acts, I dissent."
Because they're a buncha f'ing idiots.Suffice to say anything the left is spewing is made up nonsense.
They're butt hurt so they're taking it to the 'Nth' degree of impossible possibilities.
More fear mongering dem propaganda.‘Death squad ruling’: Maddow reacts to Supreme Court Trump immunity decision
Jul 1, 2024 #SupremeCourt #Trump #immunity
Rachel Maddow on the Supreme Court's immunity decision: "This is a death squad ruling. This is a ruling that says that as long as you can construe it as an official or quasi-official act, you can do absolutely anything. Absolutely anything and never be held accountable, not only while you are president, but forever."
10:16
He's stupid enough to think they can simply enact a law that alters the Constitution.
So why is it seemingly so difficult for those against Trump, to understand what that guy laid out? Everything he said is common sense stuff, at least to anyone who has even a rudimentary understanding of the Constitution and how our gov is supposed to work.Straight Down the Middle — Breaking Down the Presidential Immunity Case — Ep. 7
Jul 11, 2024
Did the Supreme Court hold Trump immune for Jan. 6? Did the Court hold that a President can get away with murder? In this video, I break down the presidential immunity case — Trump v. United States.
31:54
Just shows how stupid New York "officials" are.NY Democrat introduces constitutional amendment reversing Supreme Court immunity ruling
Rep. Joseph Morelle (D-N.Y.) introduced a constitutional amendment Wednesday seeking to undo the Supreme Court’s decision that former presidents enjoy a presumption of criminal immunity for official acts.
“Earlier this month the Supreme Court of the United States undermined not just the foundation of our constitutional government, but the foundation of our democracy,” Morelle said. “At its core, our nation relies on the principle that no American stands above another in the eyes of the law. “
Morelle’s proposed amendment would make clear that “no official may invoke immunity for criminal actions solely on the basis of the duties of their office,” the lawmaker’s office told The Hill.
The Supreme Court handed down the 6-3 decision earlier this month, ruling along ideological lines that presidents have absolute immunity for actions that fall within the core responsibilities of their office, and are “at least presumptively immune” for all other official acts.
More:
BecauseSo why is it seemingly so difficult for those against Trump, to understand what that guy laid out? Everything he said is common sense stuff, at least to anyone who has even a rudimentary understanding of the Constitution and how our gov is supposed to work.
That's gonna backfire on them...NY Democrat introduces constitutional amendment reversing Supreme Court immunity ruling
Rep. Joseph Morelle (D-N.Y.) introduced a constitutional amendment Wednesday seeking to undo the Supreme Court’s decision that former presidents enjoy a presumption of criminal immunity for official acts.
“Earlier this month the Supreme Court of the United States undermined not just the foundation of our constitutional government, but the foundation of our democracy,” Morelle said. “At its core, our nation relies on the principle that no American stands above another in the eyes of the law. “
Morelle’s proposed amendment would make clear that “no official may invoke immunity for criminal actions solely on the basis of the duties of their office,” the lawmaker’s office told The Hill.
The Supreme Court handed down the 6-3 decision earlier this month, ruling along ideological lines that presidents have absolute immunity for actions that fall within the core responsibilities of their office, and are “at least presumptively immune” for all other official acts.
More:
Only because they're stupid.That's gonna backfire on them...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?