Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more. You can visit the forum page to see the list of forum nodes (categories/rooms) for topics.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

I enjoyed this Scott Ritter interview.

Scott RItter - Ukraine Russia War Latest (14 min 04 sec):​
Published on Oct 20, 2022 by Judge Napolitano - Judging Freedom​
.
 
Col. Douglas Macgregor is a breath of fresh air.

Playing at War in Ukraine - Col. Douglas Macgregor (23 min 58 sec):​
Published on Oct 25, 2022 by Judge Napolitano - Judging Freedom​


Playing at War in Ukraine
Douglas Macgregor, Oct 24, 2022
 
Truth is the first victim of war... honestly how do we know any of this is true? We pick our sources and choose to weight our trust one way or the other. Reality is they are both lying out their a$$e$!
 
Washington's Whoppers on the War in Ukraine


excerpt:

Two deceptive arguments in U.S. propaganda are so egregious that they stand out as gigantic whoppers. The first whopper is that Russia’s war against Ukraine was entirely unprovoked; nothing Ukraine, the United States, or NATO did, this story goes, threatened Russia or contributed in the slightest to the current bloody tragedy. The second whopper is that Ukraine is a liberal democratic country whose mere existence as a model in Russia’s neighborhood terrifies Vladimir Putin and his inner circle of authoritarian oligarchs.​
...​
Criticisms of Russia’s military action as brutal and over-the-top are entirely justified. The argument that it was utterly unprovoked, however, is misleading at best and an outright falsehood at worst. Respected analysts had warned for more than a quarter century that expanding NATO eastward to Russia’s border would turn out badly, no matter who ruled in Moscow, since the move was inherently menacing and intruded on important Russian interests. Yet, multiple U.S. administrations casually spurned those recommendations for caution.​
 
Truth is the first victim of war... honestly how do we know any of this is true?
This is why I don't really follow too much from either side about what is going on there, as we have no real way of verifying any of it.

It's simply not worth risking WW3 over trying to protect what is widely regarded as the most corrupt nation in Europe.

Do I like the fact they got invaded? Heck no.
....but if we're allowed to invade other nations in what we see as our own national interest, so can any other nation.

We set that prescident in Vietnam, Iraq, and Libya.
Our gov officials looked us directly in the eye and lied to us regarding all three of those nations.


I'm more interested in knowing why so many of our career politicians had relatives working in Ukraine for huge salaries in industries they had little to no experience in.

It reeked of a kick-back racket.
 
The latest from Jacob Dreizin...

Return of the Living Check

excerpt:

Folks, the way it’s going, the Ukraine won’t be the only one getting blank checks.​
But first… So much for “the smartest people in Congress.”​
The “We love the Ukraine, but the U.S. must talk to Russia to end the war” letter to Brandon’s people, signed by the Democrat “Platoon” in the House…..​
……has been OFFICIALLY retracted and disowned by its lead signatory.​
All it took was less than 24 hours.​
Despite a dreamy, mushy, syrupy, highly favorable roll-out in the Amazon Post, the reaction from Botoxic (Pelosi) must have been so toxic…..​
…..that Rep. Jayapal had to say it was all a mistake, the letter was never “vetted”, and in fact…..​
…..we shouldn’t talk to Russia until after Russia has lost the war (which is Ukraine’s position, and thus indirectly, Uncle Sam’s as well.)​
What’s really funny is, the letter was fully vetted.​
.
 

How brave of them.

 
Truth is the first victim of war... honestly how do we know any of this is true? We pick our sources and choose to weight our trust one way or the other. Reality is they are both lying out their a$$e$!

Probably, but the people pushing this war have a strong history of living every time their lips move.

So looking who's lining up on whatever sides can help sorting out the probable horse shit.
 
Truth is the first victim of war...

Lotta truth here but I consider the first victims of war to be the innocent people simply going about their daily lives and trying to survive.

People who don't give two shits about politics or some power-hungry megalomaniac's insane lust for power and self-aggrandizing glory. People who simply want to live their lives in peace and provide for their families. Innocent people whose lives are taken from them, whose bodies, homes and property are destroyed on the whim of a lunatic.

Really sad.

Imagine if there was a way to outlaw war and to immediately get rid of any power crazed p-o-s who would dare to even think about using war as a means to satisfy some insane idea that pops into their head.

Maybe an organization like the one described in Klaatu's speech in the final scene of The Day the Earth Stood Still.........


Won't happen in my lifetime but maybe someday.

jm2c
 
Do I like the fact they got invaded? Heck no.
....but if we're allowed to invade other nations in what we see as our own national interest, so can any other nation.
You don't like that they got 'invaded', but I guess was ok that for the last 8 years the west Ukraine has been bombing the east killing 15,000 civilians they call 'separatists'?

Not picking a fight, just pointing out the 'error' in language the MSM has foisted upon the world.

The real 'truth' is Putin is 'liberating' the east and if the west doesn't mind it's manners he's going to go all the way to Poland.
 
Agreed, but I'm not sure if what you were describing is Ukraine's unrelenting military assault on the innocent citizens of eastern Ukraine over the past several years or Putin's response to the violation of international agreements???

Either way, it would be nice to end the use of large scale deadly force, period. Von Clausewitz described war in "On War" as a continuation of policy by other means. Unfortunately when people are involved and they do not/can not get their way through policy, e.g. political wranglings, they resort to war. Ever since Thucydides put pen to paper and chronicled the Peloponnesian Wars (430-410 BC, Athens vs Sparta - the battle for Greek Hegemony), it has been the way of mankind.
 
never forget -- russia/putin asked for a meeting with US/nato to discuss/negotiate security for the region before invading homeland 2.0

(US/nato) turned him down. they were hellbent to provoke russia into defending themselves so that (they) could do all of the evil sh-t they are doing now

(biden admin) picked up where (obomba admin) left off --- the coup in ukraine removed the elected president and installed (their) puppets

they slowed down during trump....until (they) stole those elections. this was one of the big prizes of stealing them - weaponizing ukraine and attacking russia came right back

people are waking up to (their) ukr scam. 57 repugs voted against the 40 billion in money laundering aid for ukr
 
It's called theft... reminds me of Rumsfeld telling us Oil from Iraq will pay for the war...

EU Ursula, seize not freeze. Boris: Cultural Learnings of America. 30 DEMS retract peace letter. U/1​

26m
 
Agreed, but I'm not sure if what you were describing is Ukraine's unrelenting military assault on the innocent citizens of eastern Ukraine over the past several years or Putin's response to the violation of international agreements???

Neither.

War...........in general.
 
From what I've gleaned from listening to the 'other' side (vs the MSM propaganda) is that the Ukraine situation was in the works decades ago.

Trump exposed it as he exposed so many things when he asked Zelenski in a 'perfect' phone call to 'look into' it. We all heard/saw the politicians go ape shit over that. They went so far as to impeach Trump over it.

That's how you know who's telling the truth, they react to the 'telling' of truth in odd and unusual ways.
 
Turn on CC for the truth. This isn't a Hollywood scripted testimony....

A Ukrainian Lady tells what she REALLY thinks about the war in Ukraine.​

2m
 
... The argument that it was utterly unprovoked, however, is misleading at best and an outright falsehood at worst. ...

I suppose that depends upon your perspective of what a provocation is and whether or not you think Ukraine is actually a sovereign country with self determination and within it's rights to choose it's own economic and defense partners. I mentioned before (more than once now?) that Putin was not going to allow Ukraine to turn to the West when his buddy got deposed. Nothing I'm reading here has changed that conviction.

They never looked at the evidence, so how would they know?

I take it you didn't actually read the article. It reports on Russian scientists dismantling the propaganda. Yes, they looked at it - and explained how what the Russian government was presenting wasn't what they were claiming it to be.
 

 
I take it you didn't actually read the article. It reports on Russian scientists dismantling the propaganda. Yes, they looked at it - and explained how what the Russian government was presenting wasn't what they were claiming it to be.
Perused the first couple of lines...

AT CONSIDERABLE RISK to their own safety,​
these outlandish claims from Russian defense officials​

That smacks of propaganda, i.e., here's how you need to think of this...? that kind of turned me off and made me think this was a made up story.

Then it goes on with even more rhetoric like that.

Right from the gitgo they make it sound as if Russia is the crazy one here. The article reminds me of the Lancet who, for 3 whole months 'gushed' about HCQ being a deathly cocktail and even fabricated a 'peer reviewed' paper only to pull it a few short days after publishing... ['peer review' is the achilles heel of the professional class]

If only the MSM was the 4th pillar keeping everyone honest instead of getting in bed with prostitutes...

Not saying there was or wasn't bioweapons being developed - that remains to be proven, but the fact is the US has been encroaching upon Russia for the last decade or more. You don't need a crystal ball to see that. Never mind that the last 60 years of US involvement in colonizing the rest of the world, er... I mean bringing democracy to the rest of the world has been the MO of the US.

Now that we know Covid was created, and recently "improved" (to be 80% effective at killing), why is it such a stretch to believe the Russians didn't find evidence that implicates the west and why is the US/west so hell bent on "saving Ukraine" by destroying it in a proxy war with Russia?

Heck, they impeached Trump over a phone call... what are they trying to hide there???
 
Dr. Steve Turley painting a picture of reality.

Is This FINALLY the END of the WAR?​

7m
 
... that kind of turned me off and made me think this was a made up story.
...
Right from the gitgo they make it sound as if Russia is the crazy one here. ...

I'm quite aware that the article isn't going to sit well with your bias. There are plenty of facts in the article worth considering. It's quite a long and detailed article. I'll quote a bit from the beginning:
 
You've well described our plight under the Bidet.


You don't like that they got 'invaded', but I guess was ok that for the last 8 years the west Ukraine has been bombing the east killing 15,000 civilians they call 'separatists'?
I don't like that, either.

I said back in '14 that should just divide the nation in two.

Imho, it's stupid to fight a war with the intention of forcing people to be a part of a political system that they do not want to be a part of.

We (US) certainly should not support that when our own Founding Docs declare that people have a Right to alter or abolish their gov if they believe it has become destructive to their well being.

. I mentioned before (more than once now?) that Putin was not going to allow Ukraine to turn to the West when his buddy got deposed. Nothing I'm reading here has changed that conviction.

Why did we not want Cuba doing that 60 years ago?

Because we saw it as a threat, perhaps?

Would we "allow" Mexico or Canada to turn to the East? Ie: strongly align themselves with either Russia or China, and against us?
Or would we pitch a major bitch about it?

Is it ok for us to invade other nations for reasons we see as being in our own national interests?
We've certainly done that. Is it right?

If so, imho every nation has that same Right. We bitch about it when others do it, but expect a blind eye turned when we do it.
 
That's quite a quote, but it concisely pars the screed down to the actual 'facts' of the story.


But it's statements like these that make it read like propaganda... It sounds like they're refuting Trumps claim the election was stolen.

More than 800 signatories... on a petition? Is that supposed to mean they're 'experts'... trying to convince me to change my mind, or did they go by the local mall and ask folks to sign a petition like they do in the US?
 

Kiev In PANIC Over Signs Of Waning Western Support​

(Democrats send letter to Bidet then take it back. Letter originally want Bidet to rethink plans for Ukraine)gb
 
USA (CIA) has done real shitty stuff all over the western hemisphere (especially to Central America). No argument from me there.

But there is a difference between what the USA has done in the Western Hemisphere and what Russia set out to do (but failed and is now doing) in Ukraine.
 
I said back in '14 that should just divide the nation in two.
I agree, but the west will say that the east has all these resources Russia wants... as if the west didn't want them? Probably the real reason for the Ukraine war from the gitgo....
 
So you're saying Russia has the same world interests as the US...? Interesting....
 
...
More than 800 signatories... on a petition? Is that supposed to mean they're 'experts'... trying to convince me to change my mind, or did they go by the local mall and ask folks to sign a petition like they do in the US?
If you want to understand the context, you really need to read the whole story (and understand the full extent of the Russian government propaganda).
 
@pmbug , if the following is true,


"The list of destroyed strains published by RIA Novosti and other Russian media outlets contains not a single particularly dangerous strain."

Why would they be concerned about anything escaping the lab, if there was nothing dangerous there?

"the Ukrainian effort to ensure that an attack on the lab there could not cause the accidental release of bacteria seems prudent."





synthetic biology methods were being tested there to enhance the microorganisms’ pathogenic properties.”

We do that stuff in Boston now. They just created a wuflu strain there that is > 800times more deadly than the original.
YaY! for science! Lol
 
@Joe King - I don't have time to investigate your question right now. I'll revisit whenever I get a chance.

 
USA (CIA) has done real shitty stuff all over the western hemisphere (especially to Central America). No argument from me there.
Not just in the Western Hemisphere, but World wide.

Iran in '52 where we installed a pro-West leader in order to gain access to their resources, was their first of many foreign operations.

Was it right for us to have done that?
 
Why would they be concerned about anything escaping the lab, if there was nothing dangerous there?
and why would they destroy them, begging the question, if there was nothing dangerous there?
@Joe King - I don't have time to investigate your question right now. I'll revisit whenever I get a chance.

"Russia's chaotic retreat..."

the west keeps touting the rout of "Russian troops". From what I've read/heard from several sources the professional "Russian military" wasn't ever there. It was the local DPR (think National Guard) troops who aren't seasoned fighters. Border patrol?

Retreating is a military strategy. Let them take useless territory while saving troops and equipment to fight another day. Then, because you know the area you can bomb the hell out of the advancers...?

Since Putin called up 300,000 reserve 'Russian' troops I sense the game is about to change.
 
Read these on USNI.

Lessons from Russian Missile Performance in Ukraine​


By Mark B. Schneider
October 2022
Proceedings Vol. 148/10/1,436

The 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine has involved the largest use of land-attack missiles in history, with launches from all basing modes. On 21 March, the Pentagon stated that the “Russians have launched more than 1,100 missiles,” and that “they have also suffered a not-insignificant number of failures of those munitions.” Four days later, the Pentagon added that “they’re still launching a lot of missiles,” but Russia was experiencing “a significant amount of [missile] failure” including “failure to actually launch or failure to hit the target.”

On 4 April, the Pentagon claimed Russia had launched more than 1,400 missiles and that its residual inventory is the lowest in cruise missiles. In late May, Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelensky stated that Russia had launched 2,154 missiles and Ukraine believes Russia has depleted 60 percent of its precision-missile arsenal. Since April, resupply has been difficult and inventory depletion has continued.

This very large expenditure of missiles was clearly not planned because Russia expected a quick victory. Russia’s efforts to replace its missiles will be very difficult because of cost, production limitations, and the impact of the sanctions. Worse still, from a Russian standpoint, is that the attacks have demonstrated there are significant problems with the performance of Russian cruise missiles.

Full article:



French Foreign Minister Warns Russian Victory in Ukraine Could Spark Worldwide Wars of Conquest​

By: John Grady
October 24, 2022 2:42 PM

Wars of conquest could become the new normal if unprovoked attacks like Russia’s invasion of Ukraine go unchecked, France’s minister for Europe and foreign affairs warned last week.

The invasion provides models for other aggressors in Europe, the Indo-Pacific, Middle East and Africa, Catherine Colonna said Friday at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

“The stakes are far beyond Ukraine and Europe,” she said. “We cannot afford that” to happen.

On Ukraine, she said France and the European Union agree that “we will support our partners as long as it takes.” France itself is taking in 2,000 Ukrainian troops for advanced weapons systems training and the other 26 EU members will train 13,000 more.

Full article:

 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…