Donald J. Trump plaintif v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA defendant

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

Will she pass the test?

'Just crazy': Ex-FBI agent says Trump's new docs filing is true test of Judge Cannon​

Former FBI agent Pete Strzok on Thursday said that Donald Trump's newest filing in the criminal case over purportedly sensitive classified documents the former president stored at Mar-a-Lago demonstrates his "abject lack of understanding of - and disregard for - classified info and national security."

Strzok, who trolled Trump over the docs case earlier this month, said that Trump is asking the Court "to waive the requirements for classified info that EVERY OTHER SINGLE CLEARANCE HOLDER IN THE UNITED STATES must follow." Strzok's comments come after former U.S. attorney Joyce Vance, who spent 20 years as a federal prosecutor, said that, unlike other people, Trump "doesn't want to have to be in a SCIF [sensitive compartmented information facility" when he discusses classified evidence with his lawyers."

More:

 
If you enjoy crime novels, who-done-its, if you consider yourself an armature sleuth, if you enjoy spotting bull shit artists...............you'll enjoy this one.


18:13

Michael Popok of Legal AF reports on Trump’s first public response to the new criminal charges that he conspired to destroy video surveillance evidence at Mar-a-Lago, and the revelation in the new indictment that there is a key insider witness cooperating against Trump with Jack Smith’s team.
 
searcher said:
If you enjoy crime novels, who-done-its, if you consider yourself an armature sleuth, if you enjoy spotting bull shit artists...............you'll enjoy this one.


18:13

Michael Popok of Legal AF reports on Trump’s first public response to the new criminal charges that he conspired to destroy video surveillance evidence at Mar-a-Lago, and the revelation in the new indictment that there is a key insider witness cooperating against Trump with Jack Smith’s team.
Click to expand...


Oh I definitely spotted a BS artist...
 

Judge in Trump documents case strikes Justice Department filings and questions 'out-of-district' grand jury​

The judge presiding over former President Donald Trump's classified documents case rebuked the Justice Department on Monday and demanded an explanation for the use of an "out-of-district grand jury."

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon's Monday order denied special counsel Jack Smith's request to file two supplements under seal, which prosecutors argued was needed to protect grand jury secrecy. Cannon's order also asked Smith to explain "the legal propriety of using an out-of-district grand jury proceeding to continue to investigate and/or to seek post-indictment hearings on matters pertinent to the instant indicted matter in this district."

More:

 
searcher said:
^^^^

www.rawstory.com

New Judge Cannon order opens door for DOJ to ask for her Trump case removal: legal experts

A stunning new ruling on Monday by U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida Judge Aileen Cannon that would expose secret grand jury testimony is grounds for the Department of Justice to call for her removal from overseeing the 40-count indictment filed against Donald Trump.That...
www.rawstory.com www.rawstory.com
Click to expand...

Ahh, what do Commies always do? When someone dares go against your railroading you just remove them.

Using a DC Grand jury to indict ham sandwiches everywhere is our God (ourselves really) given right.
 

Prosecutors: Trump Mar-a-Lago security aide flipped after changing lawyers​

A Trump employee who monitored security cameras at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate abruptly retracted his earlier grand jury testimony and implicated Trump and others in obstruction of justice just after switching from an attorney paid for by a Trump political action committee to a lawyer from the federal defender’s office in Washington, prosecutors said in a court filing Tuesday.

The aide — described as “Trump Employee 4” in public court filings but identified elsewhere as Yuscil Taveras — held the title of director of information technology at Mar-a-Lago. He initially testified to a grand jury in Washington, D.C., that he was unaware of any effort to erase the videos, but after getting the new attorney “immediately … retracted his prior false testimony” and detailed the alleged effort to tamper with evidence related to the investigation of the handling of classified information stored at Trump’s Florida home, the new submission said.

www.politico.com

Prosecutors: Trump Mar-a-Lago security aide flipped after changing lawyers

Special counsel Jack Smith’s team revealed the details of the employee’s about-face in a new filing.
www.politico.com www.politico.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom