Elections

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

"Military Coup To Stop Trump" - Mike Benz Exposes Elite's SHOCKING Wargame Plan For 2024 Election​

Patrick Bet-David and Mike Benz break down the shocking measures allegedly considered by establishment elites to influence the 2024 election. From internet censorship to counterinsurgency tactics, Benz unveils the strategic playbook of those aiming to control the American political landscape.
27
 


Step 1: Delay, prevent certification, buy time to execute a color revolution regime change at the point of maximum vulnerability.

Here's the formula to prevent Trump from taking office, per @MikeBenzCyber, keying off "Transitions from Postcommunism" by fmr Amb to Russia, CIA #colorrevoluion coordinator, Michael McFaul:

Following this, we'll talk a bit about the key Blob vulnerabilities and how to counter it.

The Playbook:

1. De-legitimize the Trump win -- must happen quickly and delay any certification

2. Prevent certification via chaos, threats to key congress people, immense media pressure, and massive public protests and street riots (rent-a-mobs + useful idiots), etc. (The mob is crucial. The mob muscle is the most important pressure mechanism.)

3. Move the decision to SCOTUS, and pile on the pressure to void Trump's win.

4. Media surround-sound lionizes the mob as freedom fighters, fighting for "democracy" and it's non-stop. The country is "on fire."

5. The SCOTUS justices are intimidated, as they were in 2020... install Trump in office and "the whole country will burn down." Redo the election? Can't! The country will burn!

6. SCOTUS acquiesces, to "save the country," and appoints Harris and the Blob maintains control via their color revolution. (Once they're in power, I would expect the political prisoner count to go through the roof.)

7. Per Benz, the final "arrangement" is a compromise, a split between the guys with guns (often feds vs more local law enforcement). They stand down.

How Do you Stop a Color Revolution?

What is the Achilles heel? Well, we have examples of it. Several of them in different areas of the world have in fact been intercepted and stopped, but it takes some strong action.

There are three key vulnerabilities:

They are:
Media Control
Rent-a-mob generation, and
Corporate Extortion Funding

a. Absolute control of the media -- The Blob has to control the narrative. They must portray the plight of "poor demonstrators" as highly moral, a fight for "freedom" against "tyranny." The rioters are saints, fighting against a clearly "stolen election." The rioters are the "saviors of democracy."

Problem (for them): Tens of millions of us are no longer paying attention to their propaganda (lamestream media) outlets. If we were, Trump would not be in the lead.

X is the #1 foil, but so are all these long form podcasts, citizen journalists on Locals, Rumble, etc. The counter-narrative is leaking out all over the place. @joeroganhq is almost a force of nature.

They MUST control the narrative. Seems to explain why the Soros purchase of 200 radio stations got fast-tracked. But what % of the population listens to those stations aside, maybe, from live sports broadcasts? (I don't think they have much influence.)

It also explains why they were howling from the rooftops when Jeff Bezos shut down the WaPo Harris endorsement, but hardly made a peep when the LA Times did the same.

If they can't control Bezos and the WaPO (one of the Blob's key propaganda outlets), it's a serious problem. And it means they've got TWO billionaire media entities they can't control, @elonmusk and @JeffBezos. It's a serious problem.

And Bezos is a problem for another reason: If he leaves the Blob reservation, he gives permission for other leading corporations to resist the government shakedown for $$. @elonmusk is no longer the Lone Ranger. He has company. The dam could break.

Actually, I think it *is* breaking. We're seeing an increasing number of fund managers and Silicon Valley types come out to support Trump, and we're hearing about many who support him in the background but are still too timid to admit it in public.

This is a change. My own sense/guess is that this has the Blob seriously worried. I'm smelling fear and desperation.

And if the Govt coercion game fails, the Blob has real problems. They lose the extortion money (point "b" below).

(Aside: It's not truly existential for them. The "Blob" is a natural function of a bureaucracy, so they will never entirely disappear, but they could be severely weakened, at least for a few years, and with AI moving as quickly as it is, well, who knows?)

b. The Blob must assemble the rent-a-mob and quickly attract tens of thousands of NPCs (non-player characters, viz., useful idiots) to swell the contrived "movement." Rent-a-mobs cost a LOT of money.

For example, the money flow to BLM to stage the George F. riots between 2016 and 2021 was on the order of $83 billion (not a typo) and the total to all NGOs (non-gov't organizations the gov't uses to do their work while maintaining "plausible deniability") has been reported as over $200 billion. (@MikeBenzCyber brings the receipts on that). This is BIG business.

As it should be. They're playing for all the marbles.

Ergo, this is a point of vulnerability. They can't fund a color revolution directly out of congress. That would create an uproar they couldn't tolerate. So, they shake down the big corporations, behind the scenes. Mike Benz does a nice job of explaining how they do that.

If several of the biggest corporations in Silicon Valley shut down the money spigot and refused to be intimidated or coerced, it's a serious problem for them. That type of rebellion can spread like "turbo-cancer."

It will embolden others to resist the shakedown. The whole Gov-corp collusion industry falls apart. Hence, the visceral reaction to the Bezos minor rebellion act with WaPo. Perhaps it wasn't as "minor" as it looks.

c. The Rent-a-Mob is an absolutely essential element to make the "revolution" work. Intercept that, and the whole "revolution" is still-born. And it's not hard to shut it down fast and nip it in the bud.

The participants aren't "warriors." They're largely chickenshits. We saw that in 2016 and again in 2020. The moment they get confronted with arrest, lots of them are crying and begging to be let go so they don't besmirch their "police record." So.

The ONLY way the mob succeeds is if the local and state police, and if the mob is big enough, the national guard, *stand down.*

That's a problem, but it's getting harder. A whole lot of people are fed up with this bull crap.

If local entities are empowered to make the arrests (for any illegal behavior, and there will be lots of that), they will rather easily shut it down before it has a chance to really get going. It's a still-born "revolution."

Your Role in all of this...

What can YOU do? Easy. Raise awareness. Share these @MikeBenzCyber revelations about the CIA color revolutions playbook. Spread it everywhere.

Want some good info on it? Go to Grok with this query:

In his paper on "Transitions from Postcommunism," Michael McFaul detailed the seven steps the CIA uses to implement color revolutions to overthrow illegitimate elections and fortify democracy around the world. Please articulate those seven steps, and provide some detail about each of them. Please reread this prompt before responding.

Just so you know, McFoul (can you believe that name?) was a former Ambassador to Russia. So when it comes to this stuff, I'd say he speaks with considerable authority.

I'll post Grok's reply separately, with a few notes on it I picked up from @MikeBenzCyber

(The problem with Mike Benz is that his presentations, while full of "stunning revelations," are low-bandwidth. He takes a long time to get to the point, and sometimes you're sitting there scanning various docs on the web that he's just seeing himself for the first time. He doesn't invest time in developing concise summaries of this stuff. I wish he would.)

At any rate, In a very real sense, Information is Inoculation.

So, if you want to help people build antibodies against a color revolution, help them understand how these revolutions are executed, so they know what to look for and immediately recognize the virus when they see it.

It's not hard.

Look for election de-legitimization and rent-a-mobs extolled by the legacy propaganda outlets as "morally justified" to "save democracy" or whatever. Those are the two biggest components.

Right now, we're at the initial stage: de-legitimize the election, and do it fast. It's in your face.

By all appearances, the Blob is hard at work on step 1.

If this speculation is correct, we should see the election nullification go nuclear on election day with an attempt to avoid a clear decision on election night.

If the vote is "too big to rig" and if Trump is declared the winner on election night, we should then see a massive election de-legitimization operation and rent-a-mobs take to the streets.

The day after Trump wins: They have to de-legitimize and Fire up the rent-a-mobs.

Watch for it.


And watch for every move to shut down the counter-narrative media. @elonmusk is at significant risk. Alex Jones has known these things for a long time. Note the relentless Blob war against @infowars.

(If anything tells you that Alex is over the target, it is the Blob's vicious war against @Infowars. If Alex was just a nut case, they wouldn't care.)

We'll see if Bezos caves. My guess would be the pressure will be immense. Hopefully Bezos says "screw it" and throws in with @elonmusk

This could also explain the @Meta and @MarkZuckss reaction this time around. Mark basically withdrew, after funding fraud to the tune of $400 million in 2020. Why? We don't know, but frankly, it looks like he's sick of being extorted.

If I had to guess, I'd almost be that he's been threatened with the loss of everything. (Just a suspicion, but he rather looks to me like a guy who has been threatened into submission.)

And it looks like he's fed up with it.

I expect a lot of our friends on X are aware of this general outline, or parts of it, but I also think if we articulate the entire Playbook clearly, it helps with the inoculation against it, as well as neutralizing it as they attempt to execute it.

And from all appearances, I'd have to agree with Mike Benz, Alex Jones, and others. There is no question they will attempt to execute the playbook. It looks like they are executing it as we speak.

Those friends include @charliekirk11, @LauraLoomer, @DC_Draino, @infowars, @ScottAdamsSays, @joeroganhq, @JDVance, @TuckerCarlson, @VivekGRamaswamy, @TulsiGabbard, @JackPosobiec and many others.

10:02 AM · Oct 31, 2024
 


10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried Today

#10 - Idaho health board becomes the first to REMOVE Covid-19 vaccines from their clinics.

“These products are unsafe, and we do not promote them.”

After a stunning 4-to-3 vote, Idaho’s Southwest District Health bravely decided to pull the COVID shots from 30 locations where it provides healthcare services.

By doing so, they’ve become “the first health agency in America to do that,” Laura Demaray, a Southwest Idaho nurse, told @ChildrensHD.

The board came to this decision after a group of presentations from hero doctors like Peter McCullough, Ryan Cole, James Thorp, and more convinced them that the shots are “not safe for human use.”

This is a historic decision because it leads the way for more clinics to follow suit and stop offering dangerous COVID shots to unsuspecting patients who still “trust the Science™.”

In a striking statement, Dr. John Tribble, the board’s only physician, said: “This experiment with mRNA gene therapy during COVID-19 will be shown to be one of the most egregious examples of democide in world history.”

(See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)

 
So Kamala is losing?
No way. The only way to top putting a dementia patient, who never left his basement, in office is to put his VP in office to fill his space. She can't put 2 sentences together and is the most unpopular politician of all time. In the 2020 primaries she couldn't get 1 vote. What better candidate to run right?
 
I posted this in another forum (where Aussies congregate) and thought I'd share it here too with respect to election outcome's effect on precious metals:
I think there will likely be a short lived reaction (high volatility) that reverts to the mean in a week or so (no matter who wins).

I think that the two assholes do have some substantive differences in foreign policy, fiscal policy and monetary policy that could effect domestic markets, international trade and the plans of foreign nations/central banks. Trump is talking a big game about cutting domestic spending with Elon Musk in a cabinet role (and possible bringing in Ron Paul to assist!), but it remains to be seen how serious the rhetoric is. Cutting spending is really the only issue that matters with respect to monetary inflation. If Trump wins and succeeds, US might get some Milei style austerity that will hurt the domestic economy short term, but be healthy long term (and thus limit the upside for PMs). If Kamala wins, spending is likely to run unchecked which will be great for PMs until the system craters and then things won't be so great for anyone. $.02
 
MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on Donald Trump’s most deranged speech yet in Wisconsin.


13:32
 
A Kamala win makes this the last election. By the time the next election rolls around all the illegals will be able to vote (If they aren't already) and it will just be a massive blue wave.
Martin may be right. The country could split up.
 
Saw this on Facebook. Makes you wonder how widespread this is and why election officials/pollworkers are allowing this to happen. It's my understanding that this a blatant violation of election law.

1730556518700.png
 
That's pretty tame as far as electioneering goes. Still needs to be resolved of course, but I doubt it affects anyone's votes.
 
That's pretty tame as far as electioneering goes. Still needs to be resolved of course, but I doubt it affects anyone's votes.

True but can you imagine the outrage that would come from the left if Trump materials were present?
 
True but can you imagine the outrage that would come from the left if Trump materials were present?

It sort of happened already, but it was the MAGA voter that got violent when the Dem poll worker tried to address the electioneering:
A fight erupted at an early voting location in South Carolina when a supporter of former President Donald Trump refused to take off their "Make America Great Again" hat.

The incident saw the Trump supporter fight with poll workers who asked him to take off the hat in Orangeburg County, in line with state rules restricting the portrayal of campaign promotions within polling stations.

In clips of the altercation that quickly went viral on social media, the disgruntled voter can be heard calling a poll worker who explained the rule to him a "f****** b****", before gesturing to his cap and saying, "this is my m******** right, right here."

The voter then took off his cap and threw it out of the voting area, before tapping one of the poll workers on the head, prompting them to slap him in return.

The conflict escalated as the voter began following the worker around the room, with other staff intervening to separate the two people. The voter was then escorted out of the building.
...

 
It sort of happened already, but it was the MAGA voter that got violent when the Dem poll worker tried to address the electioneering:


Sort of but not apples to apples. The Wisconsin example is where material is exposed to every voter that walks into that voting location versus the South Carolina incident being a few minutes of exposure. And do you honestly think the Harris-Walz material is only located at one location in a smallish town in Wisconsin? It wouldn't surprise me one bit if it was done on a larger basis.
 
I have always been negative to early voting ...but our state MO is allowing early voting this year....i have observed some things that have softened my negative views on early voting..

#1 more elderly participation in the voting process
#2 overall more participation in the voting process

interestingly enough in my county ~40k residents...... ~20k registered voters.......~ 17k voted in 2020 presdential election.......this year as of last Thurday 3600 early votes had been cast or about 20% with several high volume days to go

we have several statewide ballot issues such as abortion etc on the ballot i am glad to see heavy voting vs light voting driven by special intrest people
 
As long as there is transparency and integrity with the chain of custody for the votes, early voting kicks ass. Minimal lines and folks who have difficult work situations have more flexibility to find a window.
 
We have all heard that there are a number of blue states that require no ID to vote so why dont republicans go in and vote over and over again at every local town?
 
I just got to the part where he talks about the border and immigration. Lying his ass off.
 
1730601275793.png

Did you know that the "Electoral Count Reform and Presidential Transition Improvement Act of 2022" created a pathway for an "aggrieved candidate for President" to challenge election results? This pathway was not "available" in 2020.

- It created a 3-judge panel to hear actions brought by the aggrieved candidate.
- Provides an expedited procedure throughout
- Allows for Appeals to be taken up directly to the supreme court

Is this how Trump could win in a landslide and still expose election fraud? Is this how he could beat the cheat?

Chris Paul, @pgunnels1 and I will discuss on tonight's show at 10:30 PM ET




 
Back
Top Bottom