Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.
Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!
Than that's a terrible flaw in the design...RIP
You mean like fogging a mirror?Do they need to submit applications or actually qualify against some standard this time?
Sure getting thumped today.Looks like a big topping tail in gold yesterday.
Both AG and AU show a small gain for the year. Both could break down from here and head lower into the new year though.
I've noticed that as well. Maybe by the end of 2023 but 1st quarter I think the metals get dumped along with the rest of the markets. Once we find another bottom we get the flight to safety and the metals should start performing.Sure getting thumped today.
I'm a little concerned everyone out there seems to be tooting gold's horn for 2023...
Waiting for one last bottom is not a game I'm willing to play. Because that is a good way to get left behind. Unrealized losses don't bother me.
Not adding here. Skinny is bottom higher bottom of course than September or even the most recent one. Major low in early February or the major bottom mid year. Pick your poison. I posted the Armstrong Socrates stuff to point out that no one has all the answers all of the time. His computer was bearish at the end of the 3rd quarter because Gold could not close over $1700. Now all we did was make a triple bottom around $1610 not a big deal right? Now Socrates calls for major rallies after the first week in January.Nice chart. GDX ran into some serious resistance. We could see a small pullback but a break above $30 looks to be quite significant.
Not adding here. Skinny is bottom higher bottom of course than September or even the most recent one. Major low in early February or the major bottom mid year. Pick your poison. I posted the Armstrong Socrates stuff to point out that no one has all the answers all of the time. His computer was bearish at the end of the 3rd quarter because Gold could not close over $1700. Now all we did was make a triple bottom around $1610 not a big deal right? Now Socrates calls for major rallies after the first week in January.
If you are in the least bit bullish all you need to do is buy the extreme fear and hold. I wonder how many did not buy a stock like SILJ in the 8's or low 9's because they thought we were heading into another market crash and thought it was possible to see that stock in the 4's again.
Same for the Uranium stocks. If Crude trades under $70 and moves into the low 60's high 50's they are a major buy. Just my WAG.
Any subscriptions you recommend? Always trying to learn from the savvy ones in the industry.I pick up info here and there but do not sub anymore. I find it hard to follow him sometimes.
Do they need to submit applications or actually qualify against some standard this time?
Mortgage brokers were the convenient scapegoat.Nah.
A crack team of mortgage brokers will make everything up for you.
Any subscriptions you recommend? Always trying to learn from the savvy ones in the industry.
Wouldn't take too much of the smart money to rub up against the metals sector and make it shine.This is pretty telling from ZH wrap up today. Most people focus on the Stock Market but the Bond Market is larger and this is the worst combined 60/40 year ever.
View attachment 5247
Zerohedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
They'd be arrested for manipulating markets... LOL!Wouldn't take too much of the smart money to rub up against the metals sector and make it shine.
Or for sexual assault on a precious metal/miner.They'd be arrested for manipulating markets... LOL!
Mortgage brokers were the convenient scapegoat.
They made a lot of money! They were unlicensed until "The Big Short" happened.
Not any more! They always seem to 'license' big money makers....
Truth as I remember it... the Obama DOJ went after bankers who wouldn't lend to people (poor people) who didn't have any money, nor a pot to piss in.
End result?
Banks basically said "Screw it! If they're gonna sue us for 'discriminating' against poor people with no money, we're gonna lend like there's no tomorrow!" Which is exactly what they did! Liar's loans were everywhere, as were ARM's.
That sure made the Obama economy BOOM! until it didn't.
I even remember politicians (mostly left, if not all) crying on TV that it's every American's 'right' to own a home!
Everyone, did I say EVERYONE... wanted 'in' on the act? Yes, EVERYONE.
Even the book sellers 'teaching' you "How to buy a home with no money down!" just send me $50 for my fool proof system! They're the only ones who made $$!
Hucksters and Shucksters every damn one of them!
And nobody went to jail.I think Clinton mandated that a certain amount of subprime loans had to be made. I thought that was the Genesis of the eventual crisis. The banks didn't really want to carry the risk so they worked out how to package it up and sell it on. That was a money maker while keeping the government happy. From there I think competition just drove it to it's natural ends. Because the risk was being sold on I don't think anybody in the chain really cared about the normal checks and balances.