TheRealZed
Retired Sailor
- Messages
- 3,002
- Reaction score
- 3,609
- Points
- 298
Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more. You can visit the forum page to see the list of forum nodes (categories/rooms) for topics.
Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!
War has always been bullish for commodities.
Yes, logical, supply restriction and inventory build to avoid potential supply issues. Not incompatible with an underlying deflationary condition. Not all price rises are the result of an inflation condition, as you know much of the covid era has been these supply issues. It's hard to fathom that the Eurodollar system is short of USD while the US money base is expanding at the rate it is. The thing is, once this is over, it will likely go from under supply to massive over supply as demand for $ outside the US falls away. When? Peg that and you have the blow off phase for the gold market. JMO etc. For now I'm still staying with strong USD and stronger Gold for what will probably be judged by history as the 3rd leg (3/5 EW).
We will see.
Felix Zulauf pegged 2024 for gold strengthen in 2020 odd... he is looking good at the moment.
3/5 is supposed to be the institutional leg where most of the $$$ are made.... in theory.
Are we prepared to have Wall St on the bias confirmation team?
Gold/silver up nicely. Miners yawn. Strange
Wouldn't make anything of it unless it continues for some time.Gold/silver up nicely. Miners yawn. Strange
Interesting day/week so far. Lots of indecision/mixed messages for the metals. Short term it appears as if the $ still holds the key. We are set up for an interesting and potentially pivotal day tomorrow.
Anyone else think these maniacs would go so far as to burn Canada down to further their insane climate change bullshit narrative?
They're guerillas. They hit here they hit there.Sure... but it's Canada so?
They're guerillas. They hit here they hit there.
Think of it like this...Anyone else think these maniacs would go so far as to burn Canada down to further their insane climate change bullshit narrative?
Fourple digits.Nope, that looks like a very reasonable path to triple digits. The market response will dictate whether we go exponential from there.
As the U.S. Treasury Department refills its General Account by selling assets, $1 trillion in liquidity could be drained from markets, warned James Lavish, co-Managing Partner at the Bitcoin Opportunity Fund and Author of "The Informationist" Substack. This, in turn, could "break" markets and cause a sell-off.
...
The Treasury Department needs to raise funds to replace its cash balance, which fell from $723.3 billion to $44.8 billion over one year as the Treasury used its funds to fulfill government spending obligations. The Treasury General Account, which is the federal government's operating account, was used to fulfill these obligations during debt ceiling negotiations in Congress.
The Treasury needs $550 billion by the end of the month, as well as enough cash to fulfill retirement programs and other obligations. In total, Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan estimate that the Treasury needs around $1 trillion by the end of Q3 of 2023. To raise funds, the Treasury intends to sell assets, including short-dated T-bills.
"The worst case scenario would be that we issue so much debt so quickly that the Treasury market locks up, that we don't have enough liquidity," Lavish suggested. "I do expect there's… probably a decent chance that we still have some sort of credit event though."
...
Wheat is up 50 cents from where I bought my calls but they haven't done much yet...probably just not very liquid.
ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
Wheat or WEAT?
That's why I asked if you bought futures or the ETF. Horse of a different color it would seem. You actually didn't buy Wheat. Have you seen how poorly the Natural Gas tracker funds have performed compared to the underlying?Both, WEAT is the ETF that tracks Wheat prices. So I bought WEAT call options technically.
That's why I asked if you bought futures or the ETF. Horse of a different color it would seem. You actually didn't buy Wheat. Have you seen how poorly the Natural Gas tracker funds have performed compared to the underlying?
Yeah, UNG is one of the worse ones. The volatility ETF's are horrid though in that regard. The drag on VXX is horrible. I have so far avoided getting involved in futures but maybe if I make some money and grow the accounts I will wonder into that world. But, wheat is in Backwardation right now (a sign of physical shortages) but this also helps (the ETF like WEAT) because rolling the futures actually benefits instead of a drag when the futures are in backwardation.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?