Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more. You can visit the forum page to see the list of forum nodes (categories/rooms) for topics.
Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!
Right, and if it where Trump in that position you'd be frothing at the mouth over it as would the media.
He said what he said and it means what it means.
Identify the people running this supposed organisation, it's offices and funding etc. Explain to me why it's run by the D's and why it isn't the purview of non partisan electoral officials. Explain to me how it operates across the many disparate electoral authorities that seem to exist in the USA.
I'm calling bullshit on that idea and frankly your credibility.
Either way, it's all been timed to coincide with the campaign prior to the next election. They want him to have to spend his time dealing with this crap instead of campaigning.There may or may not be a trial.
Because you are swift enough to realize that this is all about eliminating him from being able to run for office. You don't want some people to be able to vote for whom they want. You want all the choices to mostly support your side of the political spectrum. As do all democrats. You aren't interested in a truly fair election. Interference is ok as long as your side wins. Party over nation.I'm still thinking there will be a plea deal
Because you are swift enough to realize that this is all about eliminating him from being able to run for office. You don't want some people to be able to vote for whom they want. You want all the choices to mostly support your side of the political spectrum. As do all democrats. You aren't interested in a truly fair election. Interference is ok as long as your side wins. Party over nation.
You happy with the pedophile potato?
Do you actually think he's not in China's pocket?
How about Russia? Why did the widow of Yury Luzhkov give the crackhead $3.5M?
Remember when the latest crackpot rumor was that Trump was in bed with the Russians? Russia, Russia, Russia! Remember that? Seems the pedophile and the crackhead were really the ones in bed with them all along.
Happy with all the revelations coming out about Burisma and Ukraine?
Was a registered repub until Trump came along. Now a dem. But I vote for individuals..........not a party. Doesn't matter what party a candidate is. He or she will get my vote if, in my opinion, they are the best person for the job.
Go Mittens... sad.
Or perhaps a Liz Cheney is more your style
I think there will be prosecutor malfeasance destruction. Even CBS has gotten one eye partially open. Their (CBS) assessment throws out the whole case:There may or may not be a trial. I'm still thinking there will be a plea deal.
Oh, dear. I just gotta call you on that. Your left tilt has left you in a world of unicorns.Hunter Biden is being dealt with. As far as Joe...............from what I've heard / read there is no proof of him doing anything wrong.
@Unca Walt ..................there is so much disinformation, misinformation, lies from the media it's getting to the point where I'm going to take some time off from any political posts for a while.
Was looking through my news feeds earlier and saw a shit load of anti-Trump stuff (articles - vids) all with different titles. Looked through a few other feeds with pro-Trump stuff all with different titles. One thing everything had in common was doom. If he loses...........it's the end. If he wins..........it's the end.
Then we have the flip side. Huter Biden - crook. Joe - crook and pedo.
Let's not forget headline grabbing congress critters. Get Biden! Smash Trump! Impeachment! No budget! New Laws!
Started laughing and said........yo, time to get away from this lunacy for a while. Just going to post news as it happens in real time. Done with opinion pieces.
If any real news comes up I'll post it. Until then...........exit, stage left.
Hunter Biden is being dealt with. As far as Joe...............from what I've heard / read there is no proof of him doing anything wrong.
As for Trump:
- Had he simply left office like every other president before him this thread wouldn't exist.
- Had he simply given hack all the docs he took with him he wouldn't have been charged.
- If he didn't make the phone calls to Georgia he wouldn't be about to be indicted there
I don't really know what's going to happen with all of this, but he did bring all this on by his own actions.
I do believe that he will not go to trial. Could be way off base but I think all the charges will be rolled to one plea deal where he'll plead quilty, pay a fine, get probation, leave politics for good and get on with his life. This would be a smart move. If he goes to trial, he could lose and end up in prison. What I'm talking about is basically a win - win situation for both Trump and the country.
And as to the Bidens, Trump and everything being said...................there is so much misinformation, propaganda, gaslighting and outright lies floating around that if you tried to make sense of any of it, you'd lose your mind. lmao Just look at some of the posts here (mine included) and laugh your ass off.
Need new peeps in both parties. Not the ones they have now.
Took a lot of guts for her to do what she did with the Jan 6 committee. She earned my respect and I'd give her a vote if she were to run but she isn't in the picture. Seems we may be stuck with a maniac and sleepy Joe.
"...no proof of him doing anything wrong." <-- That requires Doublethink. Have you not actually seen that video of Buy-den bragging how he got an investigator fired?
This is basically what they accused T of doing, isn't it?
Need new peeps in both parties. Not the ones they have now.
Took a lot of guts for her to do what she did with the Jan 6 committee. She earned my respect and I'd give her a vote if she were to run but she isn't in the picture. Seems we may be stuck with a maniac and sleepy Joe.
So one new guy running as an R made you quit the party? Really?Was a registered repub until Trump came along. Now a dem. But I vote for individuals..........not a party. Doesn't matter what party a candidate is. He or she will get my vote if, in my opinion, they are the best person for the job.
Yea, with kid gloves. You go lie on a federal form and buy a gun when you are not legally able to do so, and see what happens to you.Hunter Biden is being dealt with.
That is the whole pont of this. Ie: they don't want people to be able to vote for him. Ie: they are trying to tamper with an election.he'll plead quilty, pay a fine, get probation, leave politics for good and get on with his life. This would be a smart move.
Trump was a new guy, but you chose to believe the ones that you admit need to be replaced when they made up lies about him supposedly colluding with Putin.Need new peeps in both parties. Not the ones they have now.
It's exactly what they accused Trump of trying to do.This is basically what they accused T of doing, isn't it?
I'd think that it light of all that, it would be time to double down in "Search" of the truth.there is so much disinformation, misinformation, lies from the media it's getting to the point where I'm going to take some time off
Speaking of news, can ya help me out? Because it seems like this would be big news if true.Just going to post news as it happens in real time. Done with opinion pieces.
Just going to post news as it happens in real time. Done with opinion pieces.
If they did, is it legal to do that? I thought that grand juries have to be comprised of citizens who live in the State where the crime is suspected to have happened.
Or is that not true?
Judge in Trump documents case strikes Justice Department filings and questions 'out-of-district' grand jury
The judge presiding over former President Donald Trump's classified documents case rebuked the Justice Department on Monday and demanded an explanation for the use of an "out-of-district grand jury."
U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon's Monday order denied special counsel Jack Smith's request to file two supplements under seal, which prosecutors argued was needed to protect grand jury secrecy. Cannon's order also asked Smith to explain "the legal propriety of using an out-of-district grand jury proceeding to continue to investigate and/or to seek post-indictment hearings on matters pertinent to the instant indicted matter in this district."
More:
MSN
MSN is basically 90%+ opinion now
Sometimes I'll scroll through MSN's home page,
Thanks.My post in the docs thread:
Juice it up like how they've done with their reporting on Trump these past 7 or 8 years?They actual real news is usually less sensational and a bit boring, so the talking heads gotta juice it up
Thanks.
Why do you think they used an out of district grand jury?
I had read that they did so because they thought that was the only way they could get an indictment was to use a DC jury.
Is that how it is supposed to work?
If the gov's case is so rock solid, why would they feel the need to do that?
Juice it up like how they've done with their reporting on Trump these past 7 or 8 years?
Why don't they ever juice things up when they talk about ol' Joe?
Wouldn't it only be fair to give him the same scrutiny they gave Trump?
Or are they just trying to manipulate public opinion, and saying the hell with telling the truth?
Thanks.
Why do you think they used an out of district grand jury?
I had read that they did so because they thought that was the only way they could get an indictment was to use a DC jury.
Is that how it is supposed to work?
If the gov's case is so rock solid, why would they feel the need to do that?
Juice it up like how they've done with their reporting on Trump these past 7 or 8 years?
Why don't they ever juice things up when they talk about ol' Joe?
Wouldn't it only be fair to give him the same scrutiny they gave Trump?
Or are they just trying to manipulate public opinion, and saying the hell with telling the truth?
If the law allows for importing a grand jury, then it's a moot point.Couldn't begin to answer this. Don't know the law.
Why is that? Could it be because they lied about the Russia collusion bs and used those fake allegations to whip people into a frenzy? After all, those are the people hanging on every word msnbc cnn and Rachel have to say about the guy. Ie: the "get him at all costs", crowd.Donny boy sells big time.
Yea, they created the audience by having pushed the lies of Russian collusion. Now we got half the nation frothing at the mouth to get Trump, even if they gotta break the law to do it.MSN, Druge, BBB and all others loaded out with news and views on him.
Really? Show me where cnn msnbc or any of the others who have been hyper critical of Trump from day one, are doing anything even close to that with their reporting on Biden.lol They do
Msnbc cnn and Rachel are doing that? I don't see it. I see them running cover for him.Made him out to be a pedo, mentally incompetent, a big time cook, and all sorts of other crazy shit.
Did that work when you put "but mom," in front of it when you were a kid?Every one's doing it.
Can there truly ever be more than one "light"? It's our job to ascertain which light is the true light. With a name like yours, I'd have figured that's what you've been Searching for.All want you to come outta the dark and into the light. As long as it's their light
Non stop here:the "get him at all costs", crowd.
There may or may not be a trial. I'm still thinking there will be a plea deal.
The fbi did.She bleated about Russian interference, the only real difference is no one took it seriously.
Why would you plea when you are fully protected by the first amendment?