Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.
Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!
Listening now, but the cost of tugs would be the reason IMO.Why No Tugs MV Dali/Key Bridge Baltimore
Another thought is why ports are so far up the bay? There's more open water (arrows) where they could relocate ports for loading etc.Q&A on MV Dali versus Bridge with What's Going on With Shipping and gCaptain
Well, the whole POINT of insurance, is, when property is damaged, or liability determined...the insurer pays to make the injured parties whole, make restitution.Probably wouldn't cost as much as a new bridge... but hindsight is always 20/20....
Ever trace a railway line? Often times it zigzags, or uses far more land, more distance, than it needs.Another thought is why ports are so far up the bay? There's more open water (arrows) where they could relocate ports for loading etc.
Smacks of coverup...WHY IS THE INSURER NOT PAYING FOR THIS BRIDGE.
Captain Tim shares his thoughts.
Why No Tugs MV Dali/Key Bridge Baltimore
Mar 28, 2024
You might be wondering why the MV Dali didn't have tugs on here transit through Baltimore harbor. These are my thoughts.
11:28
Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@TimBatSea/videos
Link to Tim's sailboat channel: https://www.youtube.com/@svpaquita/videos
It's not a conspiracy. It's a bunch of screwups which is how the world is going.
Saying he was a Chief Engineer and BEING one, are two different things.
Maersk was only the lessor on that ship. It was owned and operated by a Singapore company. ...
Maersk Line Limited owns and operates US flag vessels, providing end-to-end transportation solutions to support the unique requirements of the US government.
...
That link goes to an archive. You can copy/paste press releases without any worries about copyright FYI.
I agree, 100-percent. Sal is probably the gold standard of insider information regarding this event. I think he's putting too much stock in NTSA statements - anything the bureaucracy says should be taken with a huge rock of salt - but otherwise, I find him credible.This isn't my wheelhouse, but Sal Mercogliano is apparently a respected voice in the sphere and if says the guy is legit, I'll give him the benefit of the doubt until shown otherwise.
...
Perhaps I was misreading a quote....
It's not a conspiracy. It's a bunch of screwups which is how the world is going.
Just before impact, it turned towards the bridge support due to something called the paddle wheel effect.The odds are not in that favor. The ship was going too fast and aimed right at the support.
Exactly.... It's not as if they had any means of steering the ship.Just before impact, it turned towards the bridge support due to something called the paddle wheel effect.
They went full astern. In forward motion, the prop turns clockwise when viewed from behind. That motion puts a torque on the vessel that wants to push the bow to port. When you suddenly reverse the prop, it pulls the stern to port and therefore the bow will turn starboard.
Add in 9 knots of forward momentum and you get a course that might look to the layman as them aiming for the bridge support.