Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.
Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!
Totally agree, but it's not the lack of food that is the problem.Only a fool would not support food security as a possible election issue. Hunger and starvation are not good things. In a different life, a different time, I spent time in the third world and saw hunger up close. Not nice to see.
And with all the taxpayer's money our elected officials spend overseas and on the defense budget no one in this country should go hungry.
Then, why are we waging legal jihad on farmers? WHY is there NOT a top-level FBI investigation into ALL THE ARSON AT FOOD STORAGE AND PACKAGING PLANTS?Only a fool would not support food security as a possible election issue. Hunger and starvation are not good things. In a different life, a different time, I spent time in the third world and saw hunger up close. Not nice to see.
Then, why are we waging legal jihad on farmers? WHY is there NOT a top-level FBI investigation into ALL THE ARSON AT FOOD STORAGE AND PACKAGING PLANTS?
That won't work. There's no way the nation will unite under the dems super lib ideas that violate the nations Founding principles.
Considering the source, what else should we expect?All leftist talking points?
If she's endorsing Trump, you just know the dem party is in the wrong.
Dems can't have that. It's everything they are working against."Make America Great Again" recalls a nation brimming with vitality, with a can-do spirit, with hope and a belief in itself.
Making sure no one is ever hungry is NOT a Constitutional duty of the federal government. If your side wants it to be, start by Amending the Constitution, not by enacting laws that violate it..And with all the taxpayer's money our elected officials spend overseas and on the defense budget no one in this country should go hungry.
Yet somehow he is 45-47?He really needs to clean house...
Probably violation of an obscure regulation.Why is it problem for Trump to have been there?
....and further, why is taking pics in a cemetery a problem? Are the dems scared that it might make Trump look good?
^^^^^^
‘Deeply offensive’: Retired General reacts to Trump’s Arlington Cemetery controversy
Former NATO Supreme Allied Commander Gen. Wesley Clark weighs in on Donald Trump’s campaign team bringing cameras during the former president's recent visit to Arlington National Cemetery
Making sure no one is ever hungry is NOT a Constitutional duty of the federal government. If your side wants it to be, start by Amending the Constitution, not by enacting laws that violate it..
Then you are wanting tje gov to take unConstitutional actions. Ie: illegal actions.Not thinking "constitutional duty" or any "side."
That's stuff for private charities to do.More along the lines of empathy for those who may need a helping hand with food.
That stuff can be shown without the gov doing illegal stuff.In my opinion good leaders inspire trust and respect by showing empathy, fairness, and kindness to everyone, regardless of their position.
Then how can you expect it to be able to do some of the stuff that you say you want it to do?Of course not
Yes, and it's likely more than 90%, but that's no reason to say it should do even more unConstitutional stuff.Not to put words in his mouth or anything but I think the point searcher is making is.a valid one. probably 90% of what the federal government does is unconstitutional.
Then how can you expect it to be able to do some of the stuff that you say you want it to do?
The vid you posted above of the mother of the killed solider made Trump seem like a pretty decent human being.I just want a decent human being in office
So unConstitutional acts justify further unConstitutional acts?We're already doing it. I'm just for ramping up things (that help people in need.)
Do you complain about Trump being labeled as Hitler by those opposed to him?I don't want to hear name calling and insults.
Yet you cheer on those YOU support for trying to get back at Trump.Don't want to hear how you plan on getting even with people you don't like.
That's what private charities are for.Tell me how you plan on helping the less fortunate citizens get a leg up.
What would help them the most, would be to get the gov out of anything to do with medical costs.Tell me how you plan on helping people with medical costs. Let me know what you plan on doing with social security.
Yet you cheer on those YOU support for trying to get back at Trump
Do you complain about Trump being labeled as Hitler by those opposed to him?
I respect your opinion. But on the flipside, I believe a single-payer system may be best. People would not have to worry about paying for medical care and businesses wouldn't have to worry about providing coverage to their employees.What would help them the most, would be to get the gov out of anything to do with medical costs.
As for social security, to truly fix that you'd first need to overhaul our inflationary monetary system that prevents people from being able to save for their own retirements.
Really now? Thou dost be too modest.I wouldn't say "cheer on"
For what? Telling people to be peaceful and patriotic?but I would like to see him be put on trial for Jan 6th.
Another biased NY jury perhaps?Let's see what a jury thinks.
You are taking his comments out of context.No, He's the one who wants to be a dictator
So has Obama. There's more evidence that he's been pulling the strings these past few years than there is evidence that Trump will become a dictator. He's already been potus, and didn't become a dictator.Has said it many times over.
I guess you've never heard the term, "keep your friends close and your enemies closer".He's the one who praises and cozies up to authoritarians and dictators.
Fits the guy you voted for. He's the one who forced people to follow his mandates at the threat of their jobs.If the jackboot fits....
The point is, it still ain't free. It just gets paid for with higher taxes, higher prices, lower wages and fewer jobs.I respect your opinion. But on the flipside, I believe a single-payer system may be best. People would not have to worry about paying for medical care and businesses wouldn't have to worry about providing coverage to their employees.
So that means continuing the ponzi scheme.Hard one here. People have paid into this (along with their employers making contributions) their entire working lives. They deserve to reap the rewards of doing that.
So you admit that changes need to be made to the system?Major changes do need to be made but the changes need to be done to better the rewards of a lifetime of work.
Why should it? Adjusted for average life expectancy, SS shouldn't kick in until at least age 75.That includes an early retirement
So more taxes? That means lower pay fewer jobs and higher costs for goods and services.more contributions from employers and the government.
Without that spending over the past many Decades, we wouldn't have been the World superpower we've been.Maybe time to end massive spending on the MIC and use the doe ray me here at home and on people.
Really now? Thou dost be too modest.
How about post a poll asking members what they think? Lol
For what? Telling people to be peaceful and patriotic?
That is what he said.
Another biased NY jury perhaps?
How 'bout a rural Texas jury instead?
You are taking his comments out of context.
So has Obama. There's more evidence that he's been pulling the strings these past few years than there is evidence that Trump will become a dictator. He's already been potus, and didn't become a dictator.
The guy you voted for did more to act like a dictator than anything Trump ever did.
I guess you've never heard the term, "keep your friends close and your enemies closer".
Edited to add: if you want to avoid war with your enemies you must be willing to talk with them.
...and Trump is the only one willing to even try talking with them.
Fits the guy you voted for. He's the one who forced people to follow his mandates at the threat of their jobs.
That's a straight up dictator move.
Had Trump done that, you'd have cried foul louder than anyone.
.....and I would be in agreement.
Because it'd be a dictator move no matter who did it.
....but you agree with it when YOUR guy does it. I'd call it out even if Trump pulled such a move.
The point is, it still ain't free. It just gets paid for with higher taxes, higher prices, lower wages and fewer jobs.
So that means continuing the ponzi scheme.
....but we aren't having enough kids for it to continue working for much longer.
How do you fix that?
Hey! I know! Your boy Biden could dictate that people fuck more and he could sign an EO banning condoms and birth control pills.
Add that to a nation-wide abortion ban and in 20 years it'll be problem solved!
We'll go back to 7+ kid families.
That'll fix it good.
So you admit that changes need to be made to the system?
That what conservatives have been saying for a very long time now.
....but are constantly fought on the issue of fixing it.
Why should it? Adjusted for average life expectancy, SS shouldn't kick in until at least age 75.
Look up average life expectancy when SS was started.
A big part of the reason it is going broke, is that more people are collecting for more years.
Make the SS retirement age 75 and the program's problems mostly vanish.
So more taxes? That means lower pay fewer jobs and higher costs for goods and services.
....and you say more money from the gov? Where does the gov get IT'S money from? Oh yea, taxes. So you mean more tax money from everyone, not just corps and the rich.
Because for every dollar the gov spends, a small portion came from your wallet.
Without that spending over the past many Decades, we wouldn't have been the World superpower we've been.
....and had we not been that, our economy wouldn't have been what it's been either.
So by the time we can stop spending on the former, we won't have it to spend on the latter due to a shrunken economy.
Really now? Thou dost be too modest.
How 'bout a rural Texas jury instead?
It's funny because it's true.You made me laugh with:
You'd say that about any jury not wiling to hang the guy.A Texas jury may not be as objective as one from NYC.
You'd say that about any jury not wiling to hang the guy.
It's not about parties, anymore. Or, moar accurately, the Uniparty.Tulsi and RFK are good additions to team Trump. I like them both even though they were in a different party. What I really like is both have a clear message for Americans. When they say something they say something and you don't need a decoder ring to figure out what they meant. There is no ambiguity in what they were trying to say. Unlike many politicians who jumble together a bunch of words to sound smart and end up saying nothing and standing for nothing in the end.
A few more videos like this one and even Searcher will be joining team Trump.
It's all brought to you by corrupt deep state congress critters libelous speech and amplified by the media... so it must be true!The brainwashed can't see past their seething anger towards Trump.
The more you listen to Kamala videos the more you realize that she literally knows nothing about anything. 40 days to do her 1st interview and she said nothing of importance and 2/3's of it needed to be deleted. It's obvious the left isn't looking for a leader. Just a figurehead so they can continue with their Agenda to destroy what's left of America.
And why hasn't the 25th been invoked to get the brain dead turd out of office?
The D's don't want to do it? The R's don't want to do it either because they're getting too much mileage out of leaving him in floundering....The more you listen to Kamala videos the more you realize that she literally knows nothing about anything. 40 days to do her 1st interview and she said nothing of importance and 2/3's of it needed to be deleted. It's obvious the left isn't looking for a leader. Just a figurehead so they can continue with their Agenda to destroy what's left of America.
And why hasn't the 25th been invoked to get the brain dead turd out of office?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?